The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: subst for the two users and delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Template:User High School Student

[edit]

Violates Wikipedia:Child protection as secondary school in Malaysia means the user's age is between 13 years old to 17 years old. See also Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 September 6 #Umbrella categories:Wikipedians born after 1992. (Note: I nominate at the wrong venue before, sorry btw.) NgYShung ^huh? 13:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it violates WP:CHILDPRO as NgYShung stated. -- MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using ((ping))) 13:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MorbidEntree: Although I don't think I support it being kept, what part of WP:CHILDPRO does it violate? Graham (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham: To be honest, I read the page wrong. So none of it. Although I do still think it isn't that great of an idea to keep it. -- MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using ((ping))) 22:19, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and Delete Subst this in for the 2 users that are using it, then delete. It is too narrow for template space with this title, and not used enough to bother userfying. Recent discussions at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Scepia/teen et. al, had no consensus to delete similar pages. WP:CHILDPRO has no prohibitions about people self-identifying. I agree that the template: and category: space may not be appropriate though. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per Xaosflux. bd2412 T 14:35, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Overcategorisation by the categorisation (the category would be deleted at WP:CfD), but there is no WP:CHILDPRO violation. Some editors above should read the pages they link. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per Xaosflux. Graham (talk) 05:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.