The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Injectapump/new article name here (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Non-notable local political person. Old stale draft Legacypac (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "Stale draft' alone is not a good reason to delete, and it is at least possible that this person is or will become notable, but this is rather too promotional. DES ^(talk) 00:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)~[reply]

Should we have a stale draft for everyone on the planet? Anyone could become notable. Legacypac (talk) 08:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.