The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. MER-C 05:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sm8900/Flashtrek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flash_Trek_2 but this draft was created during the nomination process. This draft seems abandoned by the user, and I'm not sure whether it should be kept or not. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. since it is in my own userspace. I would like to ask that it please be kept here. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's been around since 2008 and not credibly better than the version deleted. We have an attribution issue here. This version was created in the middle of the mainspace version so it may be incorporating edits from other editors. I think it'd be preferable to delete this version and suggest that the editor go to WP:DRV and argue for restoration of the original version into user or draftspace. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:UP#COPIES: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host... deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content." JohnCD (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.