The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Mainspace . At the suggestion of Mendaliv I'm going to mainspace and redirect this one. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Valoem/Bonsall UFO[edit]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was an article AfD'd from mainspace then userfied, but no activity or improvement after 2 years. Topic exists as mention at Bonsall, Derbyshire but not enough notability as a stand alone article. LuckyLouie (talk) 22:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 18:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 00:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace to Bonsall UFO sighting and redirect to List of reported UFO sightings; there are legitimate sources and writing here with minimal fluff that accompanies other UFO articles, but just not enough for notability. I think this would be a helpful redirect to the list article and should retain the history. The original title isn't a proper redirect, however, so it should go to a different title. Obviously, a stale draft, so it shouldn't sit in userspace. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, original deletion nom, and User:Davey2010. No need to keep indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.