The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. The article is currently being discussed on AFD. Ruslik_Zero 19:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Poshter Girl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

See Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Most unreleased movies do not pass notability. Suggest userifying until release and then provide information on reception and reviews. Normally articles on unreleased films, unless they have a great deal of publicity, are taken as promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Nominator comment: I reviewed Draft:Poshter Girl at AFC and declined it. The author then removed the decline template and moved this to Wikipedia space. They probably meant to move it to article space, but here it is in Wikipedia space. It doesn't belong here. Either it should be deleted or moved back to draft space. If it were in article space, I would AFD it. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Can be recreated if warranted in the future. If moved to mainspace will simply go through AfD process. Why not deal with it now. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now at best as not only is this at Wikipedia-space and not articlespace, this may still be questionable itself. SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it does not belong in wikipedia or article space at this point, it's too soon to determine if notability can be met.--RadioFan (talk) 02:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- agreed, wrong space and not notable. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - The author has moved it into article space. Can this MFD be closed, or is AFD necessary? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above, as well as cleanup the necessary redirects left in place of the move. Tiggerjay (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• The cross namespace redirect should be deleted, but the mainspace article should be discussed at AfD. I will comment on notability at the AfD. James500 (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.