The result of the debate was Delete - early close, this had only one day of edits by one editor who did little more than create a shell, creation was in September of 2007. John, considering I'm usually the one supporting keeping a marginally active project, I'd say that you can delete on sight stuff this undeveloped if it's been around long enough; a year is certainly long enough, the founder has had plenty of time to get back to work on this. Doug.(talk • contribs) 00:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Project was created in September, with no substantial edits of any kind in the interim. Project has no listed members, and relates to a subject already covered in general by other projects. Creator of the project is being notified of this discussion.
Note: Project page poorly linked to subpages, including membership list. Would consider withdrawing nomination based on my own earlier error there. John Carter (talk) 23:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)