Avatar: The Last Airbender

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this article was formally featured and even on the main page once, but has since fallen from grace. I would like to fix that.

Thanks, The Placebo Effect (talk) 04:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if the usual grammar-style peer review is needed here. I think a specific section by section of what to add and what to cut would be best. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 20:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
David Fuchs

Turn lists into prose. Many sections, such as "fighting styles", look rather shoddy with internal lists. Likewise with "Awards and nominations"
Citation needed for "The divine medium who has descended upon the mortal world."
"Online game" is a stubby subsection that should be fleshed out or merged.
Likewise, what I think the article is missing the most (besides some pictures--see if you can find a free one of the creators) is content. There's lots of stubby sections and paragraphs.
The infobox is ridiculously long. You don't need to mention every voice actor and every writer.

--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:55, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]