Juventus F.C.

Previous peer review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because...I want to nominate this article for FAC. and would like to get others thoughts about it.

Thanks, REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

NOTE: when you close this peer review, please be sure to remove it from Template:FAC peer review sidebar. If FA regulars have to do all the maintenance, they may stop following that very useful sidebar :) And please add the sidebar to your userpage so you can help out at Peer review! Good luck, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments from SandyGeorgia

• My general advice for FA aspirants is at User:SandyGeorgia/Achieving excellence through featured content; reading the other links there will be helpful (particularly, Tony1's two prose exercise pages).
• MOS:CURRENT, 7.1 Current squad is the same as Squad
• At 8,000 words of prose, the article is quite large and will have a hard time attracting reviewers at FAC. Since there is a History of Juventus F.C., it is not apparent why so much of that info is needed here (split and get two FAs for the price of one, and reviewers more likely to engage a more manageably sized article).
• MOS:SANDWICH is everywhere
• Commons links belong at the bottom of the article (WP:LAYOUT). And the same link is given twice.
• MOS:CAPTIONS, check punctuation, for example, this is not a complete sentence and should not have a full stop at the end ... Former Juventus oval emblem (top left) featured in a pennant, at SK Slavia Prague's museum.
• I doubt this is a correct use of the "Main" template: Main articles: Derby della Mole, Derby d'Italia, Juventus F.C.–A.C. Milan rivalry, ACF Fiorentina–Juventus F.C. rivalry, and Juventus F.C.–S.S.C. Napoli rivalry Those articles are not summarized to this article-- they are mentioned in this article and should simply be linked on first mention. The main template is used when this article is a brief summary of that article.
• MOS:CURRENT review needed throughout. For example, Andrea Pirlo is the current head coach of the club. should be replaced with "Andrea Pirlo was named head coach of the club in year x." or something to that effect ... make use of "as of" or indicate a year whenever a statement can become dated.
• The Chairmen History, Managerial History, etc could well go to the History sub-article, and simply have one summary statement here.
• See the links I mentioned above from Tony1 on reducing prose redundancies like "overall", Overall, Juventus have won 68 official competitions ... check for overall, in total, also, things like that after you do the exercises.
• Don't expect readers to speak math, spell out less than ... (<2.0%)
• Why is the infobox repeated in Financial information ?
• There are Harvref warnings on almost every listing in Bibliography, sample: Arpino, Giovanni; Bàrberi Squarotti, Giorgio; Romano, Massimo (1992). Opere (in Italian and Piedmontese). Milan: Rusconi Editore. ISBN 88-18-06084-8. Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFArpinoBàrberi_SquarottiRomano1992.
• On non-English-language titles, use the citation parameters |lang= and |trans-title= to give the reader an English translation.
• Overuse of however; please review throughout.
• * Run the dup link checker ... they are everywhere.

I haven't read the article, but this should give you plenty to work on. I suggest splitting the article (there is just way too much History everywhere, even beyond the History section), working on these items, finding an experienced F.C. collaborator to work with you, and once all that is done, opening another PR before approaching FAC. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]