Lady Gaga

[edit]
Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because it recently has gone through lots of changes and has been a GA since 2010. It would be nice to see how this can be further improved before going for FA. I've been working on this for a while with FrB.TG, GagaNutella, and IndianBio.

Thanks, Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brief comment by JennKR

  • Thanks Jenn. I do agree that it didn't quite flow right, but couldn't really think of a good way to fix that at first. I moved that down to the third paragraph and reworded it a bit. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting Tomica to give some input. Tomica will you kindly take a look into the article? —IB [ Poke ] 16:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey Indian and the rest of you guys! Tomorrow, you gonna have some of my input regarding the article. I read the lead though and it's very well written tbh. — Tom(T2ME) 22:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Tomica
Hey guys! I am really busy in life these days and I am going to France really soon, I will stay there 10 days; go ahead and resolve this issues, when I am back I am gonna continue with the review. Thanks for your understanding ;). — Tom(T2ME) 08:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]