Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this page is sub-optimal. Despite this, it is viewed over 72,000 times every month and is amongst Wikipedia's 10,000 most popular pages. I'd like some feedback on what sections of the article could improve, and would invite any editors to help out in improving this article, which is substantially below-par in terms of its coverage, layout, and sourcing.

Some of my own thoughts:

• Flesh out 'spleen' section
• Flesh out 'clinical significance' section
• Integrate hatnote into article main

Thanks, LT910001 (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]