Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because…
As a whole, I think I have written and rewritten this article to the stage whereby the content should be balanced enough, and in principle, meets Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. However, I have a gut feeling that the current state prose may not pass the FA process as yet. I've done a Peer Review for this article previously, but it had yielded minimal outcomes. Hope to gather inputs so as to make this article truly FA worthy.
Thanks, Mr Tan (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)