The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, this image is from 2000, and thus not likely in the public domain. Unlikely uploader created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, this image is from 1993, and thus not likely in the public domain. Unlikely uploader created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, this image is from 2000, and thus not likely in the public domain. Unlikely uploader created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article, this image is from 2000, and thus not likely in the public domain. Unlikely uploader created. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link (source) given is the website of Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. But the license stated that this work is a work of the United States Federal Government. The license is irrelevant and this image may be copyrighted Jackl 07:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I uploaded this photo for Paul Chu. The University of Houston's website has changed considerably since then. The latest webpage is this one which now does not have the photo credit. It is possible it may be copyrighted. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspiciously professional-looking photo, and I am finding copyrighted photos mislabelled as uploader's own work in his previous uploads (i.e. File:Tvm Central - Travancore.jpg). Black Kite 11:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like either an original image uploaded falsely to be used in the article, or a non-free image uploaded under own name. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept per PD-Australia & use in 1944 Skier Dude (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have any evidence that "the creator died before 1 January 1955"? J Milburn (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The creator is unknown but since it was published and used (by Qantas) before 1 January 1955 it's now in the public domain (Per ((PD-Australia))). Bidgee (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per ((PD-Australia)) and Bidgee's argument above. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a promotional shot, image is also on the subjects facebook page. No evidence the uploader holds copyright. Polly (Parrot) 13:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a promotional photo, no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. Polly (Parrot) 13:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, PD-BritishGov. Stifle (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The West Bridgford Urban District Warship Week Committee was not part of the UK government, it was a local organisation formed to raise money for the war effort. Polly (Parrot) 13:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually any urban Warship Week Committee was a subdivision of the region's (e.g. Yorkshire, Caernarvonshire etc) National Savings Committee. Thus they were area committees of the National Savings Bank, a British government owned institution charged with making communities save more by buying government bonds, savings etc. Reuv (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt their souvenir programme was crown copyright though. Polly (Parrot) 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, would a souvenir-mag from a government owned bank be crown copyright? Reuv (talk) 07:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I am convinced that this is ((PD-BritishGov)), per Reuv's arguments. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old image, posed, no meta-data, web resolution. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many images of these ships, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many images of these ships, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many similar images, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many images of these ships, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many images of these ships, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has uploaded many images of these ships, with inconsistent/missing metadata. Some original sources were found and those have been speedied, but these other images are suspicious as well. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ged UK (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, but they also claim to hold copyright on a several other images with spurious claims. The image comes from http://www.channelcanada.com/Article3050.html. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Ged UK (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims to hold copyright, but has uploaded several suspicious photos. Image comes from http://www.dav-net.com/mediatools/images/pressphoto_white.jpg Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Madman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by a user with several question copyright claims. This image is located on several different websites, but it appears to be owned by the City of Guelph. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploaded image was considerably higher resolution that the image at http://guelph.ca/cityhall.cfm?subCatID=1692&smocid=2270, can you tell where it could have come from? The same contributor has uploaded several images with the same questionability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has blanked their talk page withe the warnings about these pictures, without responding. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by an editor with several questionable image uploads. No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:41, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by an editor with several questionable copyright claims. No proof that the uploader owns this image. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by an editor with several questionable uploads. No proof that the uploader is the copyright holder. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims image is his/her own work, but it is obviously copied from a flag such as on this page —teb728 t c 23:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment More information to be found at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Irish cricket flag. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.