The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cooperative uniform logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded with GFDL tag but should be fair use. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KIDZANIA MGRTE WIKIPEDIA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• bad license; obviously jacked off the site given in the image; http://www.kidzania.co.id/ - no FUR Jack Merridew 01:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Over Da Rainbow" (Film) One-Sheet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Film poster, no source, no metadata; see my talk page -> uploader claims to be (c) holder; would need WP:OTRS for proof of this. Skier Dude (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SirJohnCOA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The General Armory does exist so technically this is NOT unsourced, but reffering as not sure of the (C) status on COA Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saito 2008-9 Westward Route1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Was listed previously on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 21 but was never resolved. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saito Sailing Plan1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Was listed previously on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 21 but was never resolved. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saito at wheel4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Was listed previously on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 September 21 but was never resolved. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 15:46, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn; Alright, just wanted to make sure. Thanks for the snotty comment, Floydian; FYI: AGF is a large chunk of my editing philosophy. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 528 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The U.S. Roads Wikiproject's Map Task Force has been producing high quality maps for years. They have been featured on the main page on at least a half dozen occasions, and (although not a requirement) the maps task force has worked their collective butts off to ensure that every GA (or higher) roadlike article has a map of this caliber; including many non-road and non-US articles. Can't we just speedily end all these discussions? Rest assured these maps are created using open-source GIS information and are created by the claimed authors. They look professional because the MTF has some excellent talent. The one thing I will admit is not all of these maps are clear that they are produced using GIS data. However, as the data is public domain, this is not a requirement. Dave (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep / Suggest withdrawl of all map nominations. This is bad faith on the nominators part to assume that because the map doesn't look like a pile of cow dung, that it couldn't have been made by one of our contributors. None of these files are possibly unfree, they are absolutely free. No reason to suggest uploader is copyright holder - "I (Ngs61 ([[User talk:Ngs61|talk)) created this work entirely by myself." seems to suggest that they are the copyright holder. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 18:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • To be fair there have been some copyright issues uncovered with some images in road articles lately, including some involving the users mentioned above. These issues could have been the motivation for the suspicion regarding the maps. However I agree it's pretty clear now that these maps are legit.Dave (talk) 20:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGsree.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo can be found here. Part of a set of uploads by a user yesterday. I have marked most of the others for speedy deletion as I could find them elsewhere on the net -- Raziman T V (talk) 10:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 402 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Complex, professional style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Uh, if you have Quantum GIS and the necessary GIS data, anyone can make a map that looks like these... – TMF 01:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all as a standard user-created WP:USRD/MTF map. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 6 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 577 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 524 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ensminger.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 170 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 189 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 306 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 550 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Nomination Withdrawn -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR 553 (Erie, NY) map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Produced by WP:USRD/MTF. We create high-quality, professional-style maps as a matter of course. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, our WP:USRD/MTF standards are this high and result in such professional maps like these. --Rschen7754 20:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyoming Highway 221 map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Replaced by File:WY Highway 221 map.svg, a better SVG version on Commons. --LJ (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete -- it was replaced as stated above, didn't get around to deleting it Ngs61 (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyoming Highway 212 map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality, professional-style map. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that the uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Replaced by File:WY Highway 212 map.svg, a better SVG version on Commons. --LJ (talk) 04:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete -- Replaced by above, didn't get around to deleting it, thanks Ngs61 (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - image is from a site that states ©2007, CARMA All rigts reserved. If a permissions email is forthcoming it can of course be undeleted or recreated - Peripitus (Talk) 02:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

====File:Carma3.jpg====

File:Carma3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo of an organization. Likely copyrighted (if not, no need for user created art). No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We created this image for our club. It is the emblem of the organization and we will add it to the WIKI page for it.N9jig (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Texarkana postcard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self claim unlikley given dates... No Notice or un-renewed copyright in old postcard? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.