|
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi! If you get the chance, would you mind revisiting the WT:HWY discussion? You're the only one opposing the proposal, and the discussion has stalled... trying to get something out of it before the momentum is gone entirely. --Rschen7754 05:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Just letting you know in private that you presumably meant to say 400,000. Four hundred million years ago, amphibians hadn't yet evolved. But, see the Pre-Cambrian rabbit.μηδείς (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
If you wish to change the process as you seem inclined to do so with this edit summary, I suggest you do it the right way rather than undo a snow closure. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
articles which have blossomed
Thank you, long standing contributor, historian and composer, for your contributions to quality articles on Canadian highways such as Ontario Highway 416, on music, such as Pink Floyd, and many more topics, for patienceand for seeing "many articles, which have since blossomed into beautiful flowers through the contributions of other editors", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 804th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know! I forgot to add the citations, but that's been taken care of now. RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 10:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ontario Highway 3, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cayuga and Norfolk County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
There is an oppose on your FAC, and the basis seems to be content related - just a FYI. --Rschen7754 23:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.