The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1Regan2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader may have put the images together but I doubt he created them himself. Eeekster (talk) 00:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ori vic Kennedy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is unlikely the uploader created this image himself. Eeekster (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ori trump sitting BEST.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is in the image so it is unlikely he took the photo. Eeekster (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RoswellAreaDistances.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No release of copyright appears on linked website. An OTRS email would fix this, but meanwhile I'm assuming this image is copyrighted. Rodhullandemu 00:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:9863301972.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a promotional image of a band, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ^xplicit 04:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:989566943 ORIG.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a screenshot of some sort, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ^xplicit 04:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Pompidou-Metz nuit 07-01-2010.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• France does not have freedom of panorama for architectures. As such, this photograph infringes on the copyrights of the structure's architects. Jappalang (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WRS Aerial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This revision shows source as Warner website. Surely not a free image or CC licensed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nova Neon.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is given as http://novatium.blogspot.com/search/label/Products which seems about right. That page states copyright Novatium, all rights reserved. Not clear why this would be free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bentworth Population.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The result of the debate was: keep. Since clarification has been received on the source of this image there is no reason to dispute that this is a free upload. May be better as wikitable, but that is not a copyright issue. I will however delete the first upload which shows a desktop and will be copyrighted. CT Cooper · talk 14:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This image may be a derivative work of copyrighted material, with the original upload in particular suggesting that is the case. It would helpful if the uploader could provide more information about how this image was created to verify it is free. CT Cooper (talk) 10:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• My mistake, I have created the table and put it on Wikipedia in the Public Domain, someone may have copied it from me, I'm not sure. I wouldn't mind if the image could get deleated, I could make a Wikitable instead for it. UKJaguar (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. License adjusted. — ξ^xplicit 22:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCF8139.JPG=600.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A photograph of a photograph, indicating that this image may be a derivative work of copyrighted material. The photograph that is the subject of the image appears to be old and could be in the public domain, meaning that this derivative work is not copyrighted. However, more information about the original photograph will need to be provided by the uploader. CT Cooper (talk) 10:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The copyright of the old photograph itself was taken in the late 1910s (I do not know the exact date) and has been kept sealed for years. The copyright of the old photo may have long expired, but I have kept the old photo recently and took a picture of it. I am not sure who took the picture itself, but it leaves no signature on the back of who took it. I took the picture recently and released the picture of the picture into the Public Domain. So all in all, I may have made a Copyright Tag mistake - it may have been taken in 1910, making it 100 years old! The copyright of it has bound to be expired. UKJaguar (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, UK copyright law is 70 years pma; for anonymous works, it is 70 years post creation if the work is unpublished, or 70 years after first publication. The law is also very specific that if you wish to claim a work as anonymous and reuse it, you must have performed all reasonable research (eliminating possible authorship and possible publication) to claim it as such. The onus is on the uploader to provide such information. Ref: commons:Template:PD-UK-unknown Jappalang (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KiberaKid small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Insufficient evidence provided to demonstrate this video still has official release as public domain from the distributors. Fæ (talk) 10:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader listed the license as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. However, the source was specified as IRNA.ir, which is the site of Islamic Republic of Iran News Agency. I did not find the file at their website, but all pages at that website are marked at the bottom as "Copyright ©2008 irna.ir All Rights Reserved". Seems extremely unlikely to be a free image and the licensing information given is almost certainly incorrect. Nsk92 (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernando-Torres.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unfree image; is taken from the FIFA website. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:KarisWilde4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like uploader just slapped an attribution tag on an advertisement.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 18:07, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kariswilde2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a screencap or blurry photo scan, but doesn't have appropriate licensing for either.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 18:10, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lakonia listing.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image was taken in 1964. Uploades says he is 24 so it can not be own work. No information how uploader got the right to release the photo as PD. MGA73 (talk) 19:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centre Georges Pompidou Fieldhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Architecture is covered under French copyright law. This drawing is a derivative of the facade of the building and hence an infringement of its architects' copyrights. Jappalang (talk) 21:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.