The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altman rock panel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Composed from non-free images. Eeekster (talk) 02:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep and tag ((subst:npd)). Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spitznagel in WSJ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• summary= "Wall Street Journal photo" - templated as CC3.0 - highly unlikely Skier Dude (talk 04:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The WSJ doesn't own this pic. I do (part of a very large acquired library). They used it (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704340504575447950667158906.html), as I have fully released it. Look at their credits. This is the only original, look at the file Metadata ("This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it") Lprideux —Preceding undated comment added 15:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Now tagged for WP:OTRS by Magog the OgreSkier Dude (talk 02:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPThirdThurs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• slightly confusing; templated CC, but says "fair use" in the summary, also the addition of "edge 102.9" makes me think this could be a promotional station photo. Skier Dude (talk 04:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nioplias82.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I found the image used in a sport site: [1] Lapost (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Tagged for speedy deletion under criterion F9. Acather96 (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kde domov muj inst.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader is most certainly not the copyright holder of the Czech national anthem, so the given license tag is bogus. The anthem as such should be public domain per ((PD-CzechGov)), but this does not necessarily apply to any of its particular recording where copyright of the performing musicians could be violated, unless it is in fact an official release by the Czech government. The uploader did not state where they got the recording, so this is impossible to determine without further info. —Emil J. 13:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Randyresumeshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims this is self-created, but searching for other images of the subject (i.e., Google Images) reveals scaled-down versions of this file used in press releases, etc. (for example, at [2]). Thus, this is a suspected publicity photo and not a self-created free image as tagged. Note: user has uploaded multiple images with similar mistagging; these have been subsequently deleted. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by CactusWriter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raktha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poster for a commercial production. Not likely owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 22:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Tagged for speedy deletion under criterion F9. Acather96 (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NTS Political Program.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of copyrighted text. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eawalsh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Improper free use license, subject's date of death indicates this is likely not PD in the US. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakib Khan1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Google image search shows file was at http://www.shaptahik-2000.com/category/recreation/page/17/ but the page has changed since Google acquired it. File was also recently deleted from Commons. Eeekster (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.