The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept and tagged ((mtc)). Damn Mickey Mouse Act. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SNDP Edu Fund.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copy of a document from the 1940s. Uploaded and licensed as "own work", but probably by mistake: the uploader evidently just meant he made the scan, not that he actually created the historical document, which he says was in his personal collection. Original might be PD though, in which case the image should be re-tagged. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• It's PD in India (corporate work from >60 years ago), but not PD in the US under the URAA. I've updated the page. —innotata 17:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmad Azari-Qomi-Bigdeli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saanei and montazeri.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• keep - This pic is cropped from pic File:Saanei and montazeri.jpg. Original file can be found at http://tourjan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/20080708134546_7_462-22.jpg. Content at website http://www.tourjan.com/ is released under GPLv2 (or later) from the Free Software Foundation.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 10:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to contact thru emails given on website and posed following query:

    Can you let me know what is the license under which content of the website 'tourjan.com' is published?
    Can we use contents published at the website at other places (website, print like pamphlets etc.)?

The answer I got is:

    you can use our post but please link us.
    and send us a feedback.

Does this means that we can use the images at website, also please let me know if I have to forward that mail to WP (where & how). --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider^tc_s 10:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• delete I can't see that license declaration anywhere on that site, but in any case, it's a blog and, like most blogs, it has a habit of mirroring whatever images its authors fancy, from whatever source, with no credits and evidently without any regard to copyright. It is useless for determining copyright. We are left with the PD claim, which, as the nom states, is self-evidently wrong. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lec.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stanisław Jerzy Lec.jpg; fair use would likely apply in this situation Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Sadads (talk) 17:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torchwood Miracle Day Title.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free logo (or title card) of a TV show. Too complex for ((textlogo)) (non-trivial graphical background effects). Not sure about validity under NFCC. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as being too advanced to qualify as 'just plain text'. Since the show's not yet aired, or really begun publicity, the image won't help identify the subject to readers, either. ╟─TreasuryTag►consulate─╢ 09:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosivka map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a map extract, which I am highly doubtful about being the users own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fulgencio Coll Bucher.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Though the website the image is from states "This image may be reproduced if the credits include: "Spanish Ministry of Defence", or "mde.es"" it also has a (c) 2009 notice. I can't see evidence that, per the image's licence here, the copyright holder has released it "for any purpose". They have allowed reproduction but have not mentioned derivative works etc.. Peripitus (Talk) 12:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Padu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Series of 10 pictures, all marked as screenshot from DVD/CD video. I origially maked these as di-no-permission, and was declined by User:Nyttend on the basis of See the uploader's username: the uploader is plainly claiming to be the creator of the original. While I accept that the uploader actually made the screenshots, it is not clear that he originally made the DVD (Why take a screenshot from a DVD, if you have the original video files, it does not makes sense).
  Also in this lot are
  *File:Padu1.jpg
  *File:Padu2.jpg
  *File:Padu3.jpg
  *File:Padu4.jpg
  *File:Padu5.jpg
  *File:Padu6.jpg
  *File:Padu7.jpg
  *File:Padu8.jpg
  *File:Padu9.jpg
   Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• There are others from this uploader, I don't want to fill the page! - but to put it in more context I did see screenshot from a DVD video of Raam Naam Sankirthan on File:Veeramaroothi Temple.jpg - which even more iffy than the ones above.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:08, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pachin90.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Series of 6 pictures, all photographs of photographs. I originally marked these as di-no-permission, and was declined by User:Nyttend on the basis of PD-self is the uploader's claim of being the source. While I accept that the uploader actually made the photos, it is fairly obvious he did not take the originals.
  Also in this lot are
  *File:Pachin91.jpg
  *File:Pachin92.jpg
  *File:Pachin93.jpg
  *File:Pachin96.jpg
  *File:Pachin97.jpg  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn in favor of fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beerse Statue Paul Janssen 070225.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beerse Statue Paul Janssen 070225.JPG. Would like qualify for fair use under Paul Janssen. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. I took this picture myself and granted Wikipedia all rights to it. If this is not clear I made a mistake in the setting of the license but the picture is free to use.Pvosta (talk) 13:42, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MilborneOne (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penny document pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a TV grab to me  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MilborneOne (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapel Night.tiff (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is tagged as ((self|cc-by-sa-3.0)) but is also found on a school's website. No source is listed on the file's description page. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 22:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.