The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ICOCHotNewsSmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "I have permission to use this file" but it doesn't prove that permission has been given. Stefan2 (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Classic ((npd)).--GrapedApe (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How do I prove that I have permission to use the file?Webmaster1967 (talk) 09:08, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • • I have contacted the creator of the image and they will send an email to verify that permission has been granted.Webmaster1967 (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as OTRS receivedSkier Dude (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meronymy.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Wrong licence. Maybe too complex for ((PD-textlogo))? Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philadelphia logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Taken from [1] and looks copyrightable. Stefan2 (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as OTRS receivedSkier Dude (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tibet charity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The text on the photo suggests that it has been taken from somewhere. Web size and no EXIF. Stefan2 (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Classic ((npd)).--GrapedApe (talk) 05:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC) OTRS confirmed.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The Photo on the scanned cover of this Tibet Charity issue was taken by me. I asked specifically about this use:

"I scanned the cover page with my photo you published, and would like to be more specific about one use: may I upload a thumbnail to Wikimedia, which will then become public. I am talking about a thumbnail 150px wide, which I want to add to my list of publication. I want to upload it licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License."

I received the following reply from the editor: You are welcome to use the scan and hope it will benefit you and many others.

--Efrat Nakash (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert morrison.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John wilson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert drake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John lindley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ardivan rodgers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrew rogers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded as ((PD-old-100)) without documentation/evidence as to the author or the year of the image's creation. While the subject died before 1923, this is a photo of a painting, which means that the painting could have been created well after the subject's death. As a separate matter, the uploader said "Used with permission from www.phideltatheta.org," which appears to indicate that Phi Delta Theta still owns the copyright. (Of course, we would need evidence of that permission to keep it on that basis) GrapedApe (talk) 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nancy Darsch 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Small, "from subject - used with permission as free license" requires OTRS ticket (Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team) Bulwersator (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• subject of photo provided this picture for free unlimited use on Wikipedia, by email to me as editor of article. please advise how best to indicate that permission on file. Thank you. Cajohnson56 (talk) 12:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • AFAIK you should forward mail to WP:OTRS Bulwersator (talk) 08:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gatesheadthunder.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free logo which does not qualify to be ((PD-textlogo)) Bulwersator (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:St-pete-bowl-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "courtesy of CEA Marketing Group" requires WP:OTRS ticket Bulwersator (talk) 09:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dpcamp2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Dpcamp3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Dpcamp4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Dpcamp5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Faran1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Faran2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The Barakooda has tagged all of his image as "Self Created". While it is possible that Barakooda created the image above, I find it unlikely. For the following reasons

1. Dpcamp4.jpg and File:Dpcamp5.jpg list a website as a source, while still claiming "Self" recreation.
2. File:Dpcamp2.jpg and File:Dpcamp3.jpg have the same Metadata as Dpcamp4.jpg and Dpcamp5.jpg, but the Barakooda doesn't source any website, let alone the same one.
3. File:Dpcamp1.jpg and was deleted for "F4: Lack of licensing information"
4. File:Faran1.jpg and File:Faran2.jpg have no Metadata at all.

Since Dpcamp2 threw 5 appear in galleries (not allowed under fair use) and Faran2.jpg is orphaned these should defiantly be deleted. I think File:Faran1.jpg should also be deleted as a photo of an packing plant in Paran is almost certainly replaceable.

All these would reasons suggest that this uploader doesn't understand when he can and cannot use "Self" creation tags. Additionally, I did not list the Barakooda other three "Self images" as they do have Metadata suggesting that it is at least possible that Metadata took the images.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 16:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sicilija-Turnir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Sudacka iskaznica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Nizozemska Turnir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Lokomotiva-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Vatroslav Piacun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sudacka iskaznica.jpg is a Vatroslav Piacun "referee identity card", Bloncaric10040 could not be the creator so the "Self Creation" tag is clearly wrong.
• All other images by Bloncaric10040 have the very simalar Metadata (ie Software used - Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows) I find it more likly that those image scanned from an unknown source, like Sudacka iskaznica.jpg
• Please note that File:Lokomotiva-1.jpg (the last of Bloncaric10040 images) is also tagged PUF by another user for similar reason.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 16:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lapu.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph lacking explicit license statement, but also showing a copyrighted statue from a country that has no "freedom of panorama" (see commons:Commons:FOP#Philippines). Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scratchlander.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Taken by Simon Gosling who authorized its use" but no proof of this. Uploader might be Simon Gosling himself if you compare this file information page with the file information page of the next item, but unfortunately it isn't possible to confirm this. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scratchlander.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dupe of the previous file; see above. Stefan2 (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBB Protein GSTA2 image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "© RCSB Protein Data Bank" according to the given web site. Dupe of the next file. Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The image in question is taken from PDB: 1AGS​. According to the PDB Policies & References, "Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both non-commercial and commercial use. Molecular images from RCSB PDB Structure Summary pages are available under the same conditions." Boghog (talk) 04:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBB Protein GSTA1 image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "© RCSB Protein Data Bank" according to the given web site. Dupe of the previous file. Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.