The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gautham Menon and Surya on the sets in Sri Lanka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source provided as Vcreations.in, and author is a flim artiste, no evidence that the uploader gained this rights —SpacemanSpiff 06:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete - Obvious copyvio --Sreejith K (talk) 19:19, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Divyanoldworkingtitle.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source and no licence but the type of image suggests something unfree to me. Stefan2 (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Riztech (talk) 03:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)riztech[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tatrinote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The first revision is from Google Maps which I suppose is unfree. The second revision has no source but the web resolution and lack of EXIF suggest that it could be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Tatrinote.jpg

• The old version is unfree and needs to be deleted. You claim that the second version was taken using "a private camera". Whose private camera was used and who took the picture? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandiabbaspur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be copyvio from Google Maps. Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See this from google code project http://code.google.com/apis/maps/faq.html Can I put Google Maps on my site without using the Google Maps APIs? Yes. Google Maps now offers the ability to embed the map that you're viewing into your website or blog, without any programming or use of the Google Maps APIs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 03:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• That doesn't make the image more free. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Googletatrinote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be copyvio from Google Maps. Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Googletatrinote.jpg

• I don't see why that would make it more free. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-tatrinote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubtful if really own work. Uploader has uploaded a lot of other suspicious images. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Image-tatrinote.jpg

• This doesn't explain why the image would be free. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These images are taken by us (a group of friends) and trying to promote the area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 03:35, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crossingpoint.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubtful if really own work. Uploader has uploaded a lot of other suspicious images. Web resolution and no EXIF. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Crossingpoint.jpg

• This doesn't explain why it would be free. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taken by a group of friends from this area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs) 03:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC) Riztech (talk) 03:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ormondcollegemelbourne.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No EXIF and lots of copyright-related notices on the uploader's talk page. Is this really own work? Stefan2 (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo - James -Zip- -Smaller-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is found at http://www.jameshyman.com/blog/ with no indication that it is free. The uploader does not seem to be the copyright holder. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo 18.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Photo 19.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Kevin Doherty and Biff henderson.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Chef Doherty.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Chef Doherty President BUSH.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader seems to have uploaded all images he could find of Chef Doherty (and has apparently done nothing else on Wikipedia). Most of his images were deleted as copyvios. These remain as orphans and probably copyvios. – Quadell ^(talk) 20:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bachata DVD.jpg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is made up of dvd covers which I think are covered under fair-use rights, but since it is orphaned I do not think it is clear to be on Wikipedia. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Badprogramming.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned Image is a screen shot for a game. I believe it is covered from fair use, but since it isnt used, I believe it should be deleted. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magic chord.mid (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Judging from the information on the file information page and the reference, it looks as if this might be © 1964 La Monte Young. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Can you copyright ratios? Hyacinth (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't know. It depends on whether it is above the threshold of originality or not. I asked about some other suspicious music images at commons:COM:VPC#Threshold of originality for music? and am hoping that someone will be able to tell. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BaghdadUniversity.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was listed as a copyvio, but I'm not sure that I agree, so I'm changing it to PUF. The thing is that it is an Iraqi web site, and Iraq doesn't have copyright relations with the United States, so it is in the public domain in the United States. This special situation is currently being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? so it might be better to wait with a decision until the discussion has finished. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I concur that there are unresolved issues with images such as these; request that we hold off on this for now. I also concur that this image is PD in the US. Buffs (talk) 05:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Per the aforementioned discussion, I've labeled the image as PD (there doesn't seem to be any objection on that line of reasoning). However, we are waiting for consensus on how to use such images. Since it's been declared as a PD image, I think it's pretty clear that this can be closed as PD image. Should the status change or we get clearer guidance, I'll happily place them en masse into WP:FFD. Buffs (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open letter by Henri Count of Paris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Yopie (talk) 22:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monetgraveplaque.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is the plaque copyrighted per commons:COM:FOP#France or is it ((PD-ineligible))? There is no information about the creator of the plaque and 1926 wasn't that long ago... Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harold Tennant.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The subject of the photo died in 1935. When was the photo taken? Was it published somewhere and if so during which year? When did the photographer die? It says that he was in office between July and December 1916 (as written on the photo) and that is probably when the photo was taken but the information isn't enough for determining the UK and US copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The image was created by me in 2006. The copyright notice associated with this image refers to that creation. As can be seen, it is a photo of a mounted photo, part of a series of images of Secretaries for Scotland which would have been created during or shortly after their period of office. In any event, as I understand it, the image I have uploaded is sufficiently distinct from the original that it has separate copyright.--George Burgess (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Your photo likely gets a copyright of its own, but the underlying photo might still be covered by copyright, and it is the copyright status of that photo which we need to find out. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.