The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Randy Napoleon by Fay Kleinman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 29#File:File:Portrait of Randy Napoleon by Fay Kleinman.jpg (closed by User:AnomieBOT because of a wrong file name): "This is a photograph of a painting which is most likely (but not certainly) still under copyright. From the lower right of the image, it appears that this painting was completed in 1986. Unless it was published prior to 3/1/1989 (keeping in mind, of course, that exhibition of the painting doesn't constitute publication) without notice and without registration within 5 years, it is under copyright." Stefan2 (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anavoi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painting of unknown provenance and authorship, claimed PD-old, but likely to be much younger judging by its style. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lokum-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Old upload from 2006, by unreliable and no longer active uploader. Has a source and a PD-author claim, but the PD claim is entirely unsubstantiated and not very plausible. Source website is marked as copyrighted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by GorillaWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facebook Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really a PD-textlogo? It looks way a bit too complex. Stefan2 (talk) 14:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I don't think it's PD-textlogo, but might be PD-self by User:Yamaaan. The problem is the sourcing is unclear. It says it's a derivative by Yamaaan of File:Facebook.svg (which is PD-textlogo), but if that's the case, the only portion used is the shape of the "f", and even there it's not exact. A Google image search turns any number of similar images without the 3-D effect, which might themselves be PD-textlogo. So I think it's possible that this is a user-created image that's a derivative of a PD-textlogo image. However, it looks like this editor has a history of uploading copyrighted works, so it's possible that this image was just pulled from somewhere else. cmadler (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belfield FM Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((PD-author)) statement. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reform & Development.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((PD-textlogo)) statement. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Changed it to (( |non-free logo )). --B for Bandetta (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, so this "possibly unfree files" discussion no longer applies. However, I have tagged it as having no fair use rationale. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are so many logos of other Egyptian political parties that no one has objected to, like File:Freedom and Justice Party (Egypt) logo.png and File:Nour Party.png and File:New Wafd Party logo.jpg. Why are the ones I upload the only ones that upset you? Can't their fair use rationale apply to the ones I uploaded as well? --B for Bandetta (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Your image was reported because of wrong licence information (first it said that it was a free image and then it said that it was an unfree image without any fair use rationale). If you want to avoid reports about improper image tagging, make sure to tag images correctly. Two of the other files that you mentioned were tagged correctly, so there is no need to report them. The third image has now been reported: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Wafd Party logo.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• This JPG file now looks OK, so it can be kept. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nyc-subway-globe-sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama for artworks in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Public domain -- published by the City of New York. Llamabr (talk) 03:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Does New York release all of its work to the public domain? There is no New York template listed at Category:US State PD templates. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; permission provided-FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MMT Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((self)) claim. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Proof of release of usage here: http://www.mmtribute.com/apps/photos/photo?photoid=148462483 Asomath 12:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The page says "Free to use and distribute." No mention of any CC-BY-SA 3.0, so the licence tag may be wrong. Is "Free to use and distribute" free enough? Does "use and distribute" include the permission to modify it, or is it more like CC-ND? --Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologize for the lack of clarity and mention of modification. The photo has now been properly released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 at the previously listed link Asomath 01:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Samuels Match Attax.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubous ((self)) statement. Stefan2 (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garfield.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((self)) statement. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Possibly fan art by the uploader, but even if so, there's the issue of character copyright. (See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Appreciate America. Come On Gang. All Out for Uncle Sam" (Mickey Mouse)" - NARA - 513869.tif) cmadler (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless user:Mozaika2 is that hack of a cartoonist Jim Davis.--GrapedApe (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESD Party.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((self)) statement. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Changed it to (( |non-free logo )). --B for Bandetta (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, so PUF no longer applies. Tagged with "no fair use rationale". --Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are so many logos of other Egyptian political parties that no one has objected to, like File:Freedom and Justice Party (Egypt) logo.png and File:Nour Party.png and File:New Wafd Party logo.jpg. Why are the ones I upload the only ones that upset you? Can't their fair use rationale apply to the ones I uploaded as well? --B for Bandetta (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linear counterpoint from Stravinsky's Octet.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Octet (Stravinsky), apparently finished in 1923 and thus presumably published in 1923 or later. At the time when this was made, Igor Stravinsky was living in France. He died in 1971, so per the 70 years p.m.a. rule currently in use in France, this is still copyrighted in France. On the URAA date (1 January 1996), France applied 50 years p.m.a., so this was copyrighted in France on that date and so this is copyrighted in the United States for 95 years from publication. Becomes free in France in 2042. If already published in 1923, it becomes free in the United States in 2019; if published later, it becomes free later. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree with Stefan2's assessment for the most part (French copyright grants an extension of 8 years and 120 days to pre-World War II musical works, so it will remain copyrighted in France until mid-2050); US copyright was restored/established by URAA and this should be deleted as a non-free file. cmadler (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• File has now been marked as fair use, which certainly looks legitimate (being used for illustration of the musical technique). PUF could be closed now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I think that it can be kept as fair use. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linear counterpoint from Stravinsky's Octet.mid (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Linear counterpoint from Stravinsky's Octet.png above. This is a MIDI file with the same information. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• As per above. cmadler (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The licensing information has been updated, so this can probably be kept now. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:13, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Izair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image was posted at http://wowturkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=500362#500362 on May 10, 2007 (about a month before being uploaded here). The uploader (Enderender) has also uploaded other files copied from wowturkey.com. Razvan Socol (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plane t.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image has a wowturkey.com watermark. It was posted at http://wowturkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=491119#491119 on Apr 30, 2007 (about 6 months before being uploaded here). The uploader (Enderender) has also uploaded other files copied from wowturkey.com.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unorthodox.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a cover illustration of some kind. If so, it is probably not free. If not, it is probably useless. Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTHOST  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Cola.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Are we really sure that this 3D rendering of a can is free? Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTHOST  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.