The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 17:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 17:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn; copyright status established. Mackensen (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand the licensing, and didn't really want anyone to make a profit from it but beyond that didn't care. If I unintentionally licensed it for people to profit from and not pass any of that back, then that's the bargain I made. Use it as you wish. btrotter (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC) P.S. I took it while visiting with my grandma- it was not for print.[reply]
Per [1] I think this can be withdrawn and I appreciate Btrotter coming here to clarify the situation. It really is a great shot of the FP9. Mackensen (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete. I'm inclined to agree that paksoldiers.com is indeed license-laundering. Miniapolis 18:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Files have been uploaded from paksoldiers.com in good faith based on this statement releasing their content under CC-BY-3.0. Unfortunately, much of the content of their site is unambiguously not their own. I found File:Gayari Rescue Operation.jpg at [2]. Two of the files are logos that wouldn't be owned by this website anyway. File:Nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan.jpg also comes from The Nation. File:Tahir Rafique Butt & Viktor Nikolayevich Bondarev.jpg comes from [3]. File:Hatf IV Shaheen-1 Missile (Pakistan).jpg clearly says it's a press release. I have no idea what the original source for File:Major General Athar Abbas ISPR.jpg is, but [4] has it in a 2011 article. It's obvious that their images are all coming from somewhere else - we can't accept this license. --B (talk) 21:35, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The website says all content is owned by it under cc-by-3.0 license .... It has its own sources and is one of the best websites which won the “Best Sector Coverage” award at Pakistan Blog Awards 2011, held in partnership with Google. It has press releases by ISPR (info released for public use) and some other content present also in other websites ... I will contact the editor of the website for any justification .... --Maxx786 (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with your views, paksoldiers.com is an organisation with a good reputation and an award winning blog.. So, its use of content belonging to other websites without permission seems strange.. Doesn't it?
For AQ Khan photo on The Nation, its also present [here]on The News International.
Similarly, the Tahir Rafique Butt photo is also present on Business Recorder [here (1)] and on News 24 (India) [here (2)].
Many other news photos also present on many other reliable sources .. So, can we conclude its license laundering done by the above website?? --Maxx786 (talk) 05:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]