The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 02:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baktar Shikan Anti-Tank Missile.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Please see OTRS ticket 2013051610003175 for more information. The source website - http://www.defence.pk/gallery/bakter-shikan/p240-baktar-shikan.html - attributes this photo to a user named "wicked warrior" and says it was uploaded in 2006. But [1] has an uncropped version of the image dated 1999. I don't see any way that we can accept the license at face value. B (talk) 03:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will contact defence.pk .... --Maxx786 (talk) 06:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

defence.pk doesn't own it. You can delete it now. --Maxx786 (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; image now has an OTRS ticket in place. Diannaa (talk) 22:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Praneet at his house.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that the uploader is the copyright holder, but it also says that the image was provided by Praneet sah. If the uploader is the copyright holder, then it is unlikely that the copyright holder would have had to provide the image to the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• This was apparently taken by a friend of Praneet Sah, per the file talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept Diannaa (talk) 23:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afro-asiatic Camelid Range.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid licence claim, I'd suppose. Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete incorrect map. The indicated map is only the range of the domesticated dromedary camel, not all afroasiatic camelids, so the name is totally wrong. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Substantially a duplicate of File:Dromedary Range.png. Seems that it may technically be a valid license claim as that image is tagged CC-0. However, if it weren't for the fact that this was uploaded as .jpg, this would be an obvious CSD-F1. --ElHef (Meep?) 03:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Said Bin Taimur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of publication. This can only be in the public domain in the United States if it was published before 1971, but it looks as if the photos of people from the indicated source easily could be unpublished family photos. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Convert to fairuse subject has been dead for 40 years, so no new free iamge can be created. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.