The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 01:05, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cezanne Khan.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid reason for public domain claim. Eeekster (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:JMKTaxiCarriage1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 3D image - made in France - No FoP Commons:COM:TOYS  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment it is the reproduction of an original industrial design article released to the public in 1898. So wouldn't the IP ownership attach to the 1898 original article, and not the more recent toy? Thus, this would be PD-1923 ; and the original 1898 article would not be protected anyways, being a publicly sold taxicab. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suspect that Commons:User:Elcobbola/Models tells that we need to use the 1960s as date of publication, although I'm not sure. File:US Copyright Registration VA0000596466.pdf indicates a date of creation and a date of publication. Do these refer to the vehicle or to the model? The copyright holder is listed as the model manufacturer, so I'd assume that the dates refer to the model, although I'm not sure. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 01:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A free translation of the poem Preveza of Kostas Karyotakis.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It may be a "free" translation - but copyright still belongs to the author (Kostas Karyotakis)  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 01:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:16th Avenue Art by N. Milljour Calgary Alberta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of 2D artwork  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 01:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maurice Nightingale Asterley.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source doesn't provide any information on the author or the date of the photo, so there's no basis for the assumption that the photo was taken before 1923. In addition, copyright for works with unknown authors lasts for 70 years after publication in the UK, so the photo may or may not have been public domain there by 1996. (Subject lived until 1935) ALH (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • ((PD-1923)) means publication before 1923, not creation before 1923. We would additionally need information about the publication history of the photo so that we can tell whether it was published before 1923. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.