The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dickies-Vinyl.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I seek a ruling on this image, User:Stefan2 claims it to be a derivative work; I contend there is no copyvio here. Carrite (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2 - ping. Carrite (talk) 03:11, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you explain why you believe that you are not violating the copyrights? -- Asclepias (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights of what?!?! This was finally answered by Deadstar below after I asked three people four times... Trout for the rest of ye... Carrite (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The uploader refuses to provide any copyright tag for the items shown on the photograph. Without any information about their copyright status, they should be assumed to be non-free. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What "items" are you speaking about? 7-inch slabs of colored vinyl are not copyrighted, the sound content on them is copyrighted... What exactly is your objection here? Carrite (talk) 05:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no doubt it is a derivative work. Eeekster (talk) 23:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of what? Carrite (talk) 05:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Derivatives of the artworks: The graphics on the discs are considered works of art, and would have their own copyrights. Presuming the photographer of the bandphoto used is a different person to the cartoonist, there are at least two other people involved in copyrighting this image. Deadstar (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for at least explaining the rationale. I will reshoot in a manner that addresses this if I get a chance. Carrite (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Consensus is there is not enough evidence that the file is free of copyright, therefore it is best to keep it as non-free. TLSuda (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lipstick-catepillar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of public sculpture in a country without Freedom of Panorama.
  This file has been debated at PUF before (in April 2013) and I believe it was closed incorrectly. In my opinion this image should be classified as Fair Use. Given the consensus recently reached to tag an image of a different sculpture by the same artist as Fair Use, and the fact that the artist's lawyers have previously used DMCA takedown notices on other images (here), I think the burden of proof was incorrectly applied in the previous PUF discussion. The sculptor (Oldenburg) has a long history of claiming copyright in his (very famous) works and maintains a current website listing all his sculptures with large copyright notices on each page. I believe it is very reasonably to assume the artist proactively claimed copyright at the time of the work's creation and it is clear that he still does. Wittylama 14:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree that without crystal clear evidence that this work was ever published without copyright notice that we should take the conservative route and assume non-free. --MASEM (t) 15:12, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2-Duarte-Honor-Boricua.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Modern artwork (mural), no FOP in the US." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washingtonpalms.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This image is web-sized, and has no EXIF data. User has uploaded many images, 99% of which have EXIF data, and most of which are "normal" sized. I suspect this is not self made. Deadstar (talk) 13:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2nd Marquis of Lema.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "No source, no painter mentioned, way to know if PD-Art applies. Subject died in 1945. Deadstar (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayern Munich Quadruple Title.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Trophy designs require a seperate status confirmation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larry Itliong Village.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• When's the building dated? This is an architectural facade, and shoul ideally be credited as well. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The building was dedicated this year, around February. Why delete the photo, when the intent of the photograph is to promote Hi-Fi as a destination, and I took the photo myself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapacman (talk • contribs) 18:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural works are subject to copyright in the US see:Commons: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States, although as you say this is your own photo, Withdrawn as ((FoP-US)), It would be reasonable to credit the Architect/Designer if known though. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per my reasoning at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive851#Advice of images please, specifically where I note that Wapacman has uploaded copyvios using image manipulation tactics to prevent automated or semi-automated discovery of those copyvios, and then gone on to claim they were his own images. Per the precautionary principle articulated at Commons, we should consider all of Wapacman's uploads tainted from a copyright perspective and subject to deletion. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidad Park.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 2 queries, This image contains architectural elements but not indication of their date. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does "Not indication of their date" mean? It was taken just a couple of weeks ago. Unidad Park was dedicated in 2007, and the mural 1995. Do I have to include all the information with this photograph I took? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapacman (talk • contribs) 18:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per my reasoning at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive851#Advice of images please, specifically where I note that Wapacman has uploaded copyvios using image manipulation tactics to prevent automated or semi-automated discovery of those copyvios, and then gone on to claim they were his own images. Per the precautionary principle articulated at Commons, we should consider all of Wapacman's uploads tainted from a copyright perspective and subject to deletion. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madness-guy-sebastian.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an album cover. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tnr cover painting 144.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an album cover. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wake up dead cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is an album cover. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Headshots europe cover art.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is looks like album coverat? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flair Embraer.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• EXIT indicates: "Copyright holder Shawn Talbot Photography" Eeekster (talk) 22:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azadi pool under construction.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be scanned from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 23:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.