The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξ^xplicit

File:Logo of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright status is unclear; source page is clearly marked Copyright (c) United Nations 2011. Copyright status of UN works appears to be in a state of flux, uncertainty or muddle; this does not fall into any category of ((PD-UN)) (which appears to be deprecated). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξ^xplicit

File:Kattankudy City.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I requested the restoration of this file pending clarification of authorship of the underlying photos. The request for clarification was sent on 22 September. No response has been received as of yet. The OTRS ticket is ticket:2015081110005726, and I will update here if any response is received. Storkk (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• I very much doubt that appropriate permission will be received from the copyright holder(s). The OTRS message was just a ruse to keep the image on Wikipedia.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 18:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that is likely, obi2canibe. But for those who bother to go through OTRS there is some benefit of the doubt, and I was also unable to find any of the underlying images previously published online. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξ^xplicit

File:100th Army Band KY State Senate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Restored at my request pending clarification on OTRS, which was requested on 18 September. No response has been received to date. The relevant ticket is 2015080410024611. Storkk (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξ^xplicit

File:Oliver Stark headshot February14 2012.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Likely taken from http://www.fanphobia.net/profiles/oliver-stark/

No evidence of copyright. Mosmof (talk) 17:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.