The result of the discussion was no consensus--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 07:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This has been through rfd before and resulted in keep. However, I should point out that it's a misleading redirect as a.) it was never called "Country Tracks", and b.) RPM had a country singles chart that was called "Country Tracks" at one point. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I agree. Tavix (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only 77 (902 total) Ghits on phrase before "we have omitted some entries very similar to the 77 already displayed" --RCEberwein | Talk 02:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note - prior AfD discussions are here (closed 21 August 2007) and here (closed 3 June 2008), both closed as "keep." What has changed since the last time? 147.70.242.54 (talk) 20:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the reasons given in the prior RfDs. Nothing has changed since then. B.Wind (talk) 06:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the fact that the name is inaccurate is not a deletion reason. Someone searching on this term will be taken to a page that is relevant to their quest; the purpose of a redirect. TerriersFan (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 07:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search for "sexual intercourse" -- smurdah^{[citation needed]} 19:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely searchTeeninvestor (talk) 15:25, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete re dirty po. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The quotation marks are unnecessary and won't help/hurt in a search. -- smurdah^{[citation needed]} 18:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was Deleted as, well, a bad redirect. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a likely misspelling. BLP problems with a specific person,(*) it's also a french surname so it will affect living people who get their name searched on the internets.

(*) already discussed and deleted here back when it pointed to a specific person, spawning this arbitration clarification request Enric Naval (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Happy to see it deleted (even though the current target was chosen by me). Avruch ^T 18:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not kosher per WP:BLP. Kristen Eriksen (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seriously now. Who thought this was a good idea? If this is deleted again I endorse salting it to prevent its repeated recreation. Protonk (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the discussion was Keep.(non-admin closure) Mastrchf (^t/_c) 16:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term/link, no incoming links. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 11:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• keep appears on target article, it's an english expression being used since centuries ago --Enric Naval (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Eric. flaminglawyer^c 02:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems to be a semi-commonly used slang, mentioned in target. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.