The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Number 57 14:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Carl Long Motorsports → Carl Long (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete Redirect could plausibly be turned into a full article. Per WP policy, if the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject, it is better that the target article contain a redlink than a redirect back to itself. D-Day (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If an article was created on his team it would be appropriate to merge it to the article on him since he's the race car driver and it's his team. This is basically an alternative name for the same subject. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Struck-out sock vote. Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• • No, it wouldn't; that's a wholly erronious assertion and one that indicates no research was done prior to !voting. If the only driver who had driven for the team was Carl Long, one might be able to make the case for covering the team on the driver's page - even though they are emphatically not "alternative name[s] for the same subject" - but he is not. The page is about the driver, not the team, and it cannot be made to include the team as that would be undue weight. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Does no harm. If the article gets created – and others seem to be the experts to be able to start them ‐ the it can just go from R to being an article. Until then, it might as well stay where it stands. Si Trew (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. It's very unlikely that someone searching for Carl Long Motorsports either doesn't know about Carl Long or hasn't already searched for him, especially if they're using our search box. --BDD (talk) 16:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As mentioned above this is an erronious redirect that should not exist; its existiance discourages the creation of a full article, points to a page that does not cover the redirect subject, and points to a page that cannot cover the redirect subject. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. The name of a template is not visible in the rendered page, so it has mostly internal significance to editors working on the topic. A proper reason for deletion might be that it's confusing or uses a term that is needed for something else. Nobody argued this, and Jax 0677 made the case for keeping most clearly. Editors seem to agree this should be kept. PM5K (an article-space redirect) is a different matter and might be discussed in the future. EdJohnston (talk) 22:29, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:PM5K → Template:Powerman 5000 (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

unlikely template-redirect The Banner talk 10:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep What possible harm could this do? What other page could it possibly refer to? --BDD (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It could: I was thinking of 5 kilohertz power modulation (in apposition to frequency modulation or amplitude modulation), actually, but doing an external search I appear to be about the only one who did. Si Trew signing as IP 84.236.37.246 (talk) 22:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think a PM5K is also a small transistor/resistor IC used for reducing voltage on microprocessors, but I should have to check my books for that and I haven't them here. A PM5K is a power modulator with five kilohms resistance. Costs you about 39p depending on whether you go to Maplin Electronics or Radio Spares or whatever your fancy be. Or have I entirely lost the plot? 84.236.37.246 (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have lost the plot a bit: you were discussing the template, I was discussing the article. Still, I think the two are pairs and snares together: PM5K redirects to the article Powerman 5000 (entirely separately from the templates, of course). Si Trew editing as IP. 84.236.37.246 (talk) 22:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Blabbermouth.net has frequently referred to "Powerman 5000" as "PM5K". If "Template:PM5K" is deleted, then "PM5K" redirect would also need to be deleted. It should probably not be purged as the "PM5K" redirect has been around since 2005. There are similar template redirects such as ((IPFW)). I think that this is another case of WP:IDLI. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But PM5K is also an abbreviation for the Sony Bloggie Camera MHS-PM5K. The Banner talk 20:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll vote to delete just as soon as we have a navbox about that camera. As we currently don't even have an article on it, however, that could take a while. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Comment - Powerman 5000 has a navigation box while the Sony Bloggie Camera MHS-PM5K does not. Barring an alternative use for ((PM5K)) (and PM5K), the redirect should be kept. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: judging on discussion above "PM5K" is a known allias for Powerman 5000, which makes this template redirect useful for mnemonic and keyboard-saving purposes. Given that no claim about worthwhile target within the same namespace was suggested, I see no viable deletion rationale. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Dire straits → Dire Straits (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Expand redirect to dab. the phrase without WP:CAPS usually means financial difficulties, but as it stands the capless redirect might do better as a rudimentary dab page with (1) financial difficulties, (2) Dire Straits (3) Dire Straits (album) (4) "Dire Straits" Mads Langer song. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I've made a sample dab below the Rfd header. My opinion is Weak Dabify for now since #1 & #2 are linked together via a hatnote in the target article, #4 isn't an article yet and we can simply add the wiktionary entry about financial issues on the main Dire Straits article.--Lenticel ^(talk) 10:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to Keep now since BDD made a better solution below.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep for the same reasons given as Lenticel - we can handle this as is for now. Besides, most searchers are not careful with caps, so it would be better to send "dire straits" directly to "Dire Straits". Dohn joe (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Since the MediaWiki software is case-insensitive by default, it's best not to treat variations in capitalization differently except in very clear cases, WP:DIFFCAPS aside. Here, we don't do WP:DICDEFs, so there's really no question about primary topic. And for what it's worth, I think "dire staits" refers to any difficult situation, not necessarily financial; Wiktionary agrees. I've created Dire Straits (disambiguation), which I think resolves the issue. --BDD (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate repoint to the new disambiguation page -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Keep per DDG. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I am sure many people don't bother to capitalize their search terms, I certainly don't. Siuenti (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Android (robot). (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Androids → Android (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Retarget to Android (robot). Android is a disambiguation page, but the robot is the only topic on the page that is regularly plurable as "androids". bd2412 T 22:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose, redirect could equally well refer to The Androids. The dab page currently has links to both. --NYKevin 23:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Androids has a "The" in it. It is also a fairly obscure topic. If these are the only topics that can be so identified, this is a WP:TWODABS situation with a clear primary topic. bd2412 T 23:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
• Retarget to Android (robot). as per BD2412 Red Slash 06:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget/Support as BD2412 there are no -s in the dab, and there is no case for a -s to be treated differently from robot here. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moot, page isn't a redirect anymore. (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Allsvenskan (speedway) → Allsvenskan (disambiguation) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Redirect blocking article creation. A red link is in this care more useful than a redirect to a disambiguation page that don't even mentions the sport of speedway. The Banner talk 21:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to start an article, you don't need to discuss it here - just go to the redirect page and click edit. But if you don't start it, red link to encourage article creation Ego White Tray (talk) 08:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 03:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Franţa → France (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete. See #Franța. Gorobay (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Romanian is not a significant language of France, therefore, not particularly related to it. WP:NOT a translation dictionary. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#DELETE criterion 8. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 03:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Οὐρήθρα → Urethra (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]
• Ourethra → Urethra  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Delete. Not especially Greek. Gorobay (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Urethras occur outside of Greece. This is a generic topic with no particular affinity for Greek. WP:NOT a translation dictionary -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#DELETE criterion 8. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Franța → France (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

This is in a language which is not official in the country mentioned in the article. Thus it should be deleted TheChampionMan1234 10:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Romanian is not a significant language of France, therefore, not particularly related to it. WP:NOT a translation dictionary. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#DELETE criterion 8. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Jerky. (NAC) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Beef Jerky → Beef Jerky (song) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

To facilitate the movement of Beef Jerky (song) to here: Alternate capitalisation is sufficient disambiguation, though I can't find the policy. Launchballer 07:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The policy is WP:DIFFCAPS. Gorobay (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Jerky. DIFFCAPS allows us to do what you're proposing, but doesn't necessarily say we should. Since Beef Jerky (song) is itself a redirect, this doesn't seem like a good case to differentiate by capitalization. --BDD (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Do something. Right now, we have a double redirect. I think BDD's idea makes the most sense, but in any event, please do not close this as keep. --NYKevin 23:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Jerky per BDD--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• retarget per BDD -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Beef Jerky (song) is a redirect. What's the point in moving it? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Create Beef jerky (disambiguation), then retarget there. Has anyone else seen the nice, long hatnote on Jerky regarding the fact that Beef jerky redirects there? By the way, I'm opting to retarget to that not-yet-existent disambiguation page per WP:DIFFCAPS. Steel1943 (talk) 11:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've WP:BOLDly disambiguated Beef Jerky (song), you can optionally move it to (disambiguation) and expand it further. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 13:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Nice job IP! I just moved that page to Beef jerky (disambiguation) and added the Quack Pack entry that was added to the hatnote. Now, Beef Jerky (song) serves as a valid ((R from incomplete disambiguation)) to that page. Also, I updated the hatnote on Jerky. Steel1943 (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 03:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Active Voice (software company) → Cisco Systems (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

According to LinkedIn (which may not be an entirely reliable source), "Active Voice, LLC was founded in 1983. In 2001 the primary application was purchased by Cisco Systems, and the remainder of the company was purchased by NEC." I'm not sure if that warrants redirect to Cisco Systems or NEC, or perhaps some other treatment. I have just created Active voice (disambiguation), where it is mentioned. Cnilep (talk) 01:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm LinkedIn to be unreliable as content is user-generated. I'd say delete as the company is not notable enough for an article and is mentioned at neither article.--Launchballer 22:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no appropriate target. We are not helping anybody by keeping redirect to the article, where the subject is not mentioned. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• .lol → Google (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Inappropriate named redirect. TheChampionMan1234 00:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Top level domain All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
  
• Delete This isn't a real TLD though, is it? Delete as misleading. --BDD (talk) 16:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, or it indeed will become a real TLD. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Google Search. The default for redirects is to keep. This is a long-standing redirect, over 9 years old and the view of the commentators is that it is a plausible typo. Such redirects are only deleted if they are in some way harmful. WP:RFD#HARMFUL states "Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.". Conversely, deleting could be harmful due to breaking long-standing external links. Since Google.com goes to Google Search it would be illogical for this redirect not also to point there. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Giigke,cin → Google (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Nonsense redirect TheChampionMan1234 00:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep obvious typo for Google.com, with a view and a half a day.--Launchballer 16:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: too many typos, stats don't suggest usefulness. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep: Plausible result of shifting the right hand to the left by one key. I'm not sure if that's a common enough occurrence to deserve a redirect, but we may as well leave it there now that it's been created. --NYKevin 19:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Google Search. As Kevin notes, this is the result of using a QWERTY keyboard and having your right hand one key too far right. This is not implausible, and it's the result of one error, not several. I'm only suggesting a retarget because Google is about the company, while Google Search is about the website itself. See the RFD for Www.google.com, held at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 November 15, as well as our Google.com redirect. Nyttend (talk) 22:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 加拿大 → Canada (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

This is in Chinese, a language not particularly relevant to the target TheChampionMan1234 00:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep harmless and 5 months old. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
  
• Delete it may be harmless but its pointless since I doubt that anyone looking for Canada would type it in Chinese especially on the English Wikipedia. I don't see the fact that it existed for 5 months as relevant.--70.49.80.26 (talk) 02:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The RfD page specifically state "consider deleting only harmful or recent redirects".~~
• Delete this is neither English, French or Inukitut, the three languages with official status as territorial languages of Canada, nor is it one of the multitude of native languages of Canadian First Nations. Thus Canada has little affinity for the Chinese rendering of Canada (加拿大, Mandarin: Jiānádà). -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep all. JohnCD (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• South Corea → South Korea (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

"Corea" is the Spanish spelling, there is no use combining it with one or more English words. Also delete the following:

• Republic of Corea
• Corean Republic
• Corea Republic
• New Corea
• Modern Corea
• North Corea
• Democratic People's Republic of Corea TheChampionMan1234 00:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Corea is an obvious phonetic typo. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
  
• Keep per WP:POFRED. 'Corea' is a misspelling of 'Korea' (they are phonetically similar) - Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 05:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep retag as ((R from typo)) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Rich Farmbrough. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Since this hadn't functioned as an actual infobox in the last eight years or so, I didn't think a new discussion at TfD would be fruitful. --BDD (talk) 03:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taipei infobox → Taipei (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 23#Template:Republic of China infobox TheChampionMan1234 00:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to infobox, and send to TfD. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC).

• Delete WP:XNR treating an article as a template, would result in a very nasty transclusion. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem with doing this is it creates an end run around TfD. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
    
• Revert and TfD per Rich. Ordinarily, I'd ask the person who redirected it why they did so, as this seems particularly odd to me. However, said user appears to be retired, so we're stuck with the most obvious course of action. --NYKevin 23:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:SNOW: I don't see any practical sense in reverting 8 years old redirect only to have it deleted via WP:TFD. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. I've converted this back to a list. It only has two libraries at the moment, but I suspect it can be expanded. Please propose merging, deletion, or some other method than turning it back into a redirect if you don't like it. --BDD (talk) 23:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• List of libraries in Taipei → Taipei (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] TheChampionMan1234 00:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and retarget to GLAM section. (Note: Create GLAM section if needed: National Central Library and Taipei Public Library Beitou Branch are a good start.) All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC).
  
• Delete per WP:REDLINK; this is a potential article. Worse, the word "library" does not currently appear in the target. If Rich or someone else wants to expend the work to add such material, they are of course free to do so. But until that happens, this is a worthless redirect. --NYKevin 23:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.