November 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2014.

Mattias Pilhede

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Falls under the 5th reason for WP:RFD#DELETE. This page has been redirecting to different -phile articles since the start, while having no justification for any redirects. A google search does not clarify the subject KJ Discuss? 23:18, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Complex Miłków

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Redirects from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page which was removed. Les7007 (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of ...for Dummies books

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 December 22#List of ...for Dummies books

Jacquees

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 December 22#Jacquees

QDR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate, with thanks to Si Trew for doing the work. JohnCD (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate I do not think that the USDOD QDR is the overwhelmingly dominant choice for QDR, Quad Data Rate in computing is also very common, especially in the form InfiniBand and some variants of RDRAM/XDRDRAM, so the hatnote should be converted to a disambiguation page 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I wasn't feeling bold, and I couldn't move it over the redirect myself. Si Trew (talk) 09:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Leading the Way (corporate song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect's subject seems to be related to Apple Inc. in one way or another, but I cannot find a reference to this subject in any Apple Inc.-related article. Steel1943 (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. The redirect is specifically to History_of_Apple_Inc.#Xerox_PARC_and_the_Lisa and it was me who made the redirect to go that subsection. So I assume there was something about it in that subsection when I made the redirect. Let me have look at old versions of the page. —ajf (talk) 00:53, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Ajfweb: The redirect previously targeted Apple Inc.#1981.E2.80.931985: Lisa and Macintosh until I changed the redirect's target a few minutes ago. It seems that the previous section at some point merged over to History of Apple Inc, but the previous section didn't exist, so I targeted the redirect to its closest match, but them found out that the redirect's subject isn't mentioned there either. Steel1943 (talk) 00:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware. If I look at the page as it was at the end of 4 June 2009 (the date I made the redirect), there's no mention of the subject. I can't really see why I bothered making a redirect, then. I mean, the song is from that era of Apple's history, but it's just an obscure corporate song which Wikipedia doesn't mention anywhere. So I say Delete. —ajf (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.