The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/Arguments/Image-Display → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/Arguments → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Could this be a test page? The /Image-Display redirect held the text "hmm" before being redirected, and the other redirect has always been one. I don't see what use these pages serve. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both - Not useful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the talk pages which are valid subpages of the main article talk page. The article namespace pages were likely created to stop them being redlinks, but this is not required or particularly useful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, Thryduulf, that's what I missed. That's clearly the purpose of these redirects, and I agree with your analysis. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Randy Stockmaster → Green Springs Elementary School (Ohio)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Non-notable principal of a non-notable elementary school that has been redirected to the school district per the norm for non-notable elementary schools. This was apparently part of a test case on lower level school articles. See Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 125#Rechallenging the right for any type of school to have its own article! and the school article redirect discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Springs Elementary School (Ohio). Meters (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Forgot to mention that this has zero page views in the last 90 days. Meters (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Fully agree with the comments made by Thryduulf and BDD. Given those concerns, I feel like an earlier deletion would have been justified under WP:IAR and WP:SNOW, given the delete !votes.---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Danish cartoons (without pictures) → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, incorrect redirect without any edit history. I'm assuming there was a proposal for a separate article without the depictions of Muhammad? Whatever the case, there is consensus that some depictions are okay for the article, making this redirect inaccurate. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete too vague and not a term used for the event like "Danish cartoon crisis". there's also a "Danish cartoons" redirect to the same page so this is an unnecessary disambiguation. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Vague and otherwise just not helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as misleading. If someone was searching for this they would not be happy to end up at the target which features pictures of Danish cartoons. Thryduulf (talk) 12:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Thou shalt not make graven images, I believe is in the book of Moses or something, oh hang on that is the Christain old testament, and in the Talmud, and in the Koran... rather much depends on what you mean by graven image. It seems not to mean photo-engraving, or photogravura, for example, the nearest we get is lithograph, I think, gravura is too far away. Si Trew (talk) 10:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't see any other option here, and I'm essentially forgoing my right to close the discussion, but I feel compelled to comment here. This is about as harmful as a redirect can get. I'm sure its creation was in good faith, but now, it's extremely malicious. I completely respect WP:NOTCENSORED and the display of the cartoons at the target article. But dangling a search term like this in front of readers who may be looking for information on the topic without viewing the cartoons themselves is cruel and misleading. --BDD (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Islamic boycott → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Muslim Boycott → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Boycott Muslims → Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This can't be the only or most notable boycott involving Muslims and/or Islam. Do we have a better target for these redirects? -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. Let the search find possible articles as with Jewish boycott. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both - These are extremely vague. Numerous Muslim groups and individuals have called for boycotting a wide variety of things. It's like saying 'Human Boycott', 'Female Boycott', or 'Christian Boycott'. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both. Way too vague even for a list article. Thryduulf (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Any target this could possibly refer to is bound to be a POV. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to International A-class catamaran. --BDD (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• A Cat → Cat  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We don't have similar redirects for other pets. SSTflyer 10:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to International A-class catamaran where the term is mentioned. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This existing isn't helpful when we have both 'Acat' and 'ACAT'. People should be just use the search engine without the awkward 'A Cat' being auto-completed for them. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that 'A cat' is red. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per CWM. The sailboat nickname seems generally to be hyphenated and after that there's no decent target. Mangoe (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Usually but not always. Peter James (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lots of PTMs for "A Cat". Best to let the search continue. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Search results aren't useful here, as the first (and possibly only) topic this could refer to, International A-class catamaran, is on the third page after many irrelevant results. Peter James (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Champion and hatnote to other uses. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to International A-class catamaran and create A-Cat to redirect there as well. Someone wanting the animal won't search "a cat". After filtering out the animal, results seem to be dominated by International A-class catamaran. Nice find, Champion! -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hyde Covered Bridgee → Kingsbury Covered Bridge  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as recent obvious typo. Correctly spelled redirect was created one minute later. Speedy tag removed. I wouldn't bother except misspelling shows up on dropdown in Search box. Station1 (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I see no reason to keep this re-direct as the correctly-spelled re-direct already exists. Guy1890 (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. SSTflyer 04:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Joseph Baena → Arnold Schwarzenegger  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete or retarget to Raw Deal (1986 film). SSTflyer 12:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and refine target to Arnold Schwarzenegger#Marital separation where it talks about the Baenas (mistress and son). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep SSTflyer, sorry, I don't understand the objection, Baena is mentioned in article and would be too young for any connection with that film. Boleyn (talk) 16:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Bodybuilding competitions featuring arnold schwarzenegger → Arnold Schwarzenegger  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Is this a valid search term? SSTflyer 12:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It's the only one of those search phrases for "bodybuilding competitions featuring (person)" AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:08, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This seems worthless to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Someone looking for this actually could find it at Arnold Schwarzenegger#Bodybuilding career. Or possibly Arnold Schwarzenegger#List of competitions, where Bodybuilding competitions featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger points. At a glance, both lists seem to include competitions not included on the other. --BDD (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No comment on the Broadway prospects for Si's musical. JohnCD (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• THATCHER! → Margaret Thatcher  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Thatcher is a disambiguation page. SSTflyer 12:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete sounds like the name of a play but that doesn't exist. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I second/third that completely. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If this redirect is deleted? We should thusly delete OBAMA! (and OBAMA) also.--Nevé–selbert 18:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  I fail to see any use for OBAMA! either. You should nominate it. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  @CoffeeWithMarkets: Nominated.--Nevé–selbert 19:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:FUTURE. It seems like all you have to do with musical theatre these days is to stick an exclamation mark at the end and call it a hit. We should probably

Write for Obama we know our RS (yes!)

Was he from Hawaii, do you have to guess *yes!)

The first non black man black man who ever was pres

And made it a roaring success (or didnt, depending on your point of view)

He is the guy whose old wife is a charmer

She wows all the folks saying hubby's Obama

Now she is the one that should be underdressed

The voters expect quite nothing less.... the voters expecks nothing less (or more, depending on your point of view).

Would that be a suitable opening intro, and suitably NPOV? Si Trew (talk) 11:16, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• THATCHER → Margaret Thatcher  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Thatcher is a disambiguation page. SSTflyer 12:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no affinity to all caps. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  I find it much more likely than not that someone searching for "Thatcher" in all caps is looking for the prime minister. She motivated a lot of ill feeling, not that I make any argument either way. Per the lede at All caps: "Short strings of words in capital letters appear bolder and "louder" than mixed case, and this is sometimes referred to as "shouting"." Anyone shouting "THATCHER" (or "THATCHER!", for that matter) is certainly more likely than not looking for the prime minister. If this redirect (and the one above) is deleted, I think perhaps MAGGIE! or Maggie! should be created, given its use in the infamous socialist battle cry "Maggie Out" (i.e. Maggie, Maggie, Maggie! Out! Out! Out!).--Nevé–selbert 19:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see your reasoning, User:Neve-selbert, but I disagree. People searching for Thatcher will just search for Thatcher. That their mobile phone doolalies capitalise it is because of this redirect, not because of them typing it that way. Or they are just lazy. What the real problem is is that Thatcher is a DAB and THATCHER is not. So we have things that vary in case, and that's always a tricky one. As a British person, I would say THATCHER was primary for Margaret Thatcher, it is not as if people are going to look for people who do thatching, though I know a couple of people who do exactly that (and one of them, his wife is called Margaret, which is another roll-your-eyes job as if that's the first time they ever heard that one), but that would be a WP:SURPRISE. I think best to take it to the DAB at Thatcher. Retarget to DAB per AngusWOOF as ((R from ambiguous page)). Si Trew (talk) 11:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. While I believe Margaret Thatcher would be the primary topic for "THATCHER", I do think it might be a tad confusing to have "Thatcher" and "THATCHER" go to different places. The all-caps isn't necessary so I believe it's safe to delete it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Christina Aguilera#Legacy. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• List of artists influenced by Christina Aguilera → Christina Aguilera  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article talks a lot about artists that influenced Xtina, but not vice-versa. SSTflyer 12:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There's Christina Aguilera#Legacy that has a paragraph where it starts listing people she's influenced. But it's not a list like we'd expect for a list article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#D5 nonsense, WP:RFD#D2 confusing. The target is not a list of artists.... it is not a list... this is patent nonsense. Things that start "List of", by convention, are lists of things: another way to search as if we didn't have search portals, rfds, categories. This just ends up in a WP:SURPRISE as I am sure the nom had to find it is not a list of artists influenced by Crizzy Waters. Si Trew (talk) 11:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak refine to Christina Aguilera#Legacy. The nominator is incorrect since the article does list artists influenced by Christina Aguilera. It's not the kind of redirect I'd encourage creation of (which is why I'm weak), but it's certainly not incorrect, confusing, or nonsense. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and refine per Tavix. Just because it's not bulleted doesn't mean it's not a list. --BDD (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Christina Aguilera#Legacy per Tavix. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Christina Aguilera#Legacy. It's a list and there is the appropiate section that its "Legacy". Chrishonduras (Diskussion) 20:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• List of unreleased Christina Aguilera songs → Christina Aguilera  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article does not contain such a list. SSTflyer 12:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No such list exists, and I'm not sure if it would be notable enough to keep even if it did exist. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to note that we do have List_of_songs_recorded_by_Christina_Aguilera#B-sides_and_unreleased_songs, but that's fundamentally different given that B-sides are, by definition, songs that do see large-scale release. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, and there's more B-sides: this is pretty much WP:FUTURE as the R. If they are released even as B sides, and I don't know what that means these days because i remember when you had to get up to your dansette and actually change it over to the B side, so it can't mean that any more, so it must mean "stuff to fill up the release" or something like that. By the way Funky Moped was a hit only because of it being on the B side, the A side the BBC refused to play, while at the same time employing its performer. Si Trew (talk) 11:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh we don't have an article about Funky Moped. I better get on that. Performed by Jasper Carrott. Si Trew (talk) 11:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both'. JohnCD (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Calvin harris (band) → Calvin Harris  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Calvin Harris (band) → Calvin Harris  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A person, not a band. SSTflyer 12:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no indication he has a steady band with the exact same name as the artist. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both - I also don't think that these are worth keeping. This isn't a situation like we have with Paul McCartney and Bruce Springsteen, say, who associate themselves with notable musicians and have bands connected deeply with their own individual fame. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Steinski & David Guetta → David Guetta  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Steinski" not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 12:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete until such a relation is established. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:32, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This was probably created from a red link in Herbal Blend, but the link was there as a result of vandalism a few months earlier. Peter James (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - They're both notable enough artists to merit their own Wiki pages, but I don't see any significant connection between the two. Even if that were the case, we'd have a classic WP:XY problem. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Panheads → Skillet (band)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 12:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fan group name. Reconsider if the article actually talks about them as with Deadhead.AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. The discussion doesn't look likely to change after a relist. I'd agree that ((R from sort name)) isn't called for since this isn't a normal or proper way to sort the band's name. I'll leave it at ((R unprintworthy)). --BDD (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Zeppelin, Led → Led Zeppelin  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A band, not a person. SSTflyer 12:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no such arrangement of a stage name or album name as such. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No, Led Zeppelin is not the name of an actual person. (I did grin and chuckle, though.) CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as ((R from wrong name)) and ((R from sort name)). For those not familiar with the band, it's plausible that they might think it's refers to a person. Zeppelin is a surname after all. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep, this does no harm that needs to be corrected. I don't know that it does much good, either, but that's not sufficient reason for deletion. 64.105.98.115 (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Patar Knight an the IP. Thryduulf (talk) 12:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This redirect's existence could confuse readers who somehow look it up into believing that there is a person by this name. Steel1943 (talk) 12:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Highly unlikely, as anyone following the link will be educated otherwise. It's no different to the (tens of?) thousands of redirects from incorrect names and misspellings that already exist. Thryduulf (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who is not familiar with the target subject (since there is always someone who is not familiar with something) may think otherwise. And just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS doesn't necessarily mean it's correct or helpful either. Steel1943 (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it's discussions such as this one that may help determine if the status quo for similar things should remain. Steel1943 (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, it's harmless and is getting some use. There were a couple spikes that approached 30 views/day in mid-July, for example. I wouldn't technically call this a(n) ((R from sort name)) as the band should be sorted by "Led" and not "Zeppeln". -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• List of appearances by Carrie Underwood → Carrie Underwood  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article does not contain a list of appearances. SSTflyer 12:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete vague. Appearances could mean in filmography or in concert. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• CarrieUnderwoodAppearances → Carrie Underwood  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a likely search term. SSTflyer 12:21, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete vague what appearances mean. Filmography? Concerts? And no such term where all the words are bunched together like that. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This looks like a clear-cut case. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Finley Peter Dunne#Legacy. JohnCD (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Disturbing the comfortable, comforting the disturbed → Slipknot (band)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Huh? SSTflyer 12:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Huh? per nom. Err, I mean delete retarget per below (how could I miss that?). The sentence seems to be of biblical inspiration, but I could not find a song (or whatever) with that title. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Finley Peter Dunne#Legacy. It's one of many variants on a Dunne quote, riffed on by Banksy, Mary Karr and others (possibly including Slipknot). Dunne originally said that newspapers "comforted the afflicted, and afflicted the comfortable". Wikishovel (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Lights (Ellie Goulding album)#Tour. JohnCD (talk) 16:54, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Lights Tour 2010 → Ellie Goulding  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Propose retargeting to Lights (Ellie Goulding album)#Tour. SSTflyer 12:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Bonny Bear → Bon Iver  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 12:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to The Halcyon Days Tour. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Halcyon Tour → Ellie Goulding  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to The Halcyon Days Tour. SSTflyer 12:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• @SSTflyer: WP:JUSTDOIT. Retarget proposals shouldn't be at RFD unless they're controversial, and I'm not seeing why this particular redirect would be. The proposed target was the original target, before a couple double redirect fixing bots moved it to the current target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. No other notable tours with Halcyon in it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget both to Winston Marshall. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Country Winston Marshall → Mumford & Sons  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• "Country" Winston Marshall → Mumford & Sons  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Winston Marshall or delete. SSTflyer 12:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. Appears to be a nickname when he was with Mumford and Sons, but good enough to put in as either a credited alias (infobox) or the article itself. [1] [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC) updated 16:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Tyler Joseph. JohnCD (talk) 16:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• No Phun Intended → Twenty One Pilots  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article, non-notable. SSTflyer 11:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Tyler Joseph – appears to be a solo project. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Tyler Joseph - yes solo project. I'd boldly move this. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Turkish Beliebers → Justin Bieber  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article does not contain any information related to Turkey. SSTflyer 11:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redirects should not house fansite names when they are not mentioned in the article. WP:NOTREPOSITORY AngusWOOF (bark • sniff)
• Delete - I agree completely. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Ариана Гранде Бутера → Ariana Grande  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a valid WP:FORRED. SSTflyer 11:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. JohnCD (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Alcohollica → Metallica  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Alcoholica → Metallica  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 11:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I've combined these into one item. --BDD (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The very term alcoholism was rather WP:NEOLOGISM at the time, superseding words like "drunkard", but it has leant itself to chocoholism, shopoholism and various others. (the sign is not simply (-ism, but -oholism). WP:NOTDIC, although Wikt doesnt list it anyway. It is not as if this were melancholia or somesuch. This is just a madeup word really. As a regular supplier of empties to the Trade, I know quite a lot about both. Neither are pharma terms, so no chance of putting them there. Si Trew (talk) 10:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Metallicats → Metallica  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 11:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete redirects should not house fan group names when they are not mentioned in the article. WP:NOTREPOSITORY AngusWOOF (bark • sniff)
• Delete - I don't think that this is particularly notable even among my fellow fans of the band, let alone the regular public. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Bay Area Metallibangers → Metallica  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in article. SSTflyer 11:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Seems to be a hoax, barely any Google search results for the term. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete redirects should not house fan group names when they are not mentioned in the article. WP:NOTREPOSITORY AngusWOOF (bark • sniff)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Mtlca → Metallica  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No evidence this refers to the band. SSTflyer 11:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -

1. Per WP:R#KEEP, "If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do".
2. The redirect was created years ago, so IMO the time has passed for changing the redirect without significant confusion. Alleged confusion is not very plausible at all. So absent evidence of any harm there is no reason to delete.
3. "There seems to be no evidence of confusion, just conjecture on the part of nominator, and no argument grounded in WP:R. Laziness is the exact purpose of redirects, to be perfectly honest, and the creator of a useful redirect that saves one or two characters should be commended. We don't delete redirects based merely on conjecture. Someone obviously found these useful given they were created."
4. "One of the lowest things one can do is steal another mans tools. So you have no use for it. There is zero reason to take away something that has no higher use."
5. "Redirects are cheap. There are lots of little abbreviated things pulled up over the years such as ((tlc)) or ((tlx)) or whatever as useful shorthand for editors."
6. If ((Tlc)) and ((Tlx)) are acceptable names for templates, my redirect is also acceptable as it is. If not, it should be renamed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The allowance for short "Template:" namespace page names does not apply to the article namespace. In the article namespace, unless the name is a known name for the target, it is misleading to readers. Steel1943 (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not an abbreviation used by the band or by writers covering the band. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by admin User:Anthony Appleyard, as noted himself below. (non-admin closure) by Si Trew (talk) 10:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• SAITM : The Green Campus → South Asian Institute of Technology and Medicine  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect was created in good faith by the administrator immediately after deleting the original, a blatant spam article fork of the redirect target by an employee of the university. The only mention I can find online of "the green campus" in connection with this university is in one of their own press releases, and it seems highly unlikely anybody would be searching for the university with those terms, Wikishovel (talk) 08:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOTADVERTISING. Unless there's evidence of multiple SAITM campuses designated with different colors like SAITM: The Blue Campus or SAITM: The Yellow Campus. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as blatant advertising. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I have deleted it. It had no incoming links from articles. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:16, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AO-sobimatu → Template:PD-ineligible  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused, seems to be in Estonian, this is the English Wikipedia - probably falls under the category of being an implausible redirect. FASTILY 04:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unused, and I can see no use for it. JohnCD (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy close. This came about from an improper move away from this title, which has been restored. Use WP:RM to suggest moving the page. Cúchullain ^t/c 04:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Love Yourself → Love Yourself (Justin Drew Bieber Song)  (links · history · )     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A part of work to make 'Love Yourself (disambiguation)' moving to 'Love Yourself'. Maestro 121 (talk) 02:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, strongly supported of it -- nominator's vote. This wiki is too Justin-focused. There's several "Love Yourself" too!--Maestro 121 (talk) 03:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.