< August 3
August 5 >

August 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 4, 2017.

Spike(rugrats)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The version with a space, Spike (Rugrats), exists. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Kent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix (talk) 23:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Duke of Kent and Duchess of Kent (disambiguation). --Nevé–selbert 17:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Gloucester

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of Gloucester. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget both to Duke of Gloucester. --Nevé–selbert 17:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Princess Royal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Princess Royal. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Princess Royal. --Nevé–selbert 17:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Earl of Wessex

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Earl of Wessex. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Earl of Wessex. --Nevé–selbert 17:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of York

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Duke of York. Uncontested. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Duke of York. --Nevé–selbert 17:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duke of Cambridge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget as proposed. -- Tavix (talk) 23:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Duke of Cambridge and Duchess of Cambridge. --Nevé–selbert 17:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Duchess of Cornwall

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget/delete as proposed. -- Tavix (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Duchess of Cornwall and Duchess of Rothesay. See similar discussions here and here. --Nevé–selbert 17:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Madelaine Petsch

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects for an actor should not redirect to a single piece of their work, they are known for acting in different media (at this point, SIX). -- AlexTW 02:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo Co. Ltd. - 任天堂株式会社

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete, implausible mixed-script redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 00:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rentiantang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted without opposition. bd2412 T 03:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN as Chinese romanization. -- Tavix (talk) 00:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nintendo underwear

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This was a silly little stub from 2006, should have been deleted then. -- Tavix (talk) 00:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Latamel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per pt:Latamel, this is a Nintendo distribution company in Latin America, but we don't seem to cover it on the English language Wikipedia. -- Tavix (talk) 00:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Well, I gotta start somewhere with these, so I guess I'll take the most obvious one. Hinduism in the Pitcairn Islands does not exist. According to Pitcairn Islands#Religion, the entire population is Seventh-Day Adventist. The only redirect of this form that would make sense is Seventh-Day Adventism in the Pitcairn Islands, but that doesn't even exist.-- Tavix (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More