< June 20
June 22 >

June 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 21, 2017.

Chaudhari (S.T)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There's been an interesting discussion about some abbreviated version of "Chaudhari (scheduled tribe)" -> "Chowdhary" being a useful redirect, but the consensus is "this particular version of it is not useful". Editors are welcome to create redirects at the other titles discussed in this RfD as they see fit. Deryck C. 16:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The use of S.T is unclear, and the article does not help clarify. -- Tavix (talk) 21:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good point on scheduled tribe - that can be a valid qualifier. But, I stand by my original proposal that "ST" and the like are confusing to anyone who doesn't know what one is, unless the target is precise. Narky Blert (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is S.T the correct abbreviation? The scheduled tribe article uses ST. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of kammas category

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 16:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While the target article does have a (small) list, it is not a category. -- Tavix (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blade Runner (2014 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The consensus here is to delete but the number of participants is small. So I'm leaving this note here to say if anyone feels we've made a mistake they're welcome to boldly recreate redirects in this batch with good reason (like a soft delete). Deryck C. 16:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion[edit]

Here is the next batch of "faulty crystal ball" film redirects. As these years have already passed, it's impossible for these films to be released that year. It's also implausible that someone would type these redirects in the search bar due to the incorrect year disambiguation. (raw list available on talk page) -- Tavix (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Luke Hemmings (Member of 5 Seconds of Summer)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 16:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is unlikely to be useful due to the unwieldy and non-standard disambiguation. -- Tavix (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reality Leigh

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 4#Reality Leigh

Donald Trump–Russia relations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facetious? It doesn't make much sense to cover "bilateral relations" between an individual and a country. And even if we did have an article to the tune of Donald Trump's connections to Russia, the election interference would only be a subtopic there. BDD (talk) 15:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Psycho (Borderlands character)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Borderlands 2#Psycho and Ultimate Vault Hunter Upgrade Pack which satisfies the "not in target article" argument. -- Tavix (talk) 23:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target article, not even in the respective "Characters" section. Lordtobi (✉) 10:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yellow people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Color terminology for race. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 03:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not the best target. Prisencolin (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also note the existence of The Yellow People and Yellow race to the same target. -- Tavix (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There's also Lego minifigure /s--Prisencolin (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Color terminology for race is a very good solution, in fact the obvious one. Malays were subsumed under Mongoloid but I'm not sure they were also considered yellow, Blumenbach put the Malay race as part of his brown race. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Austin dickinson (vocalist)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend this redirect for deletion (see [4]) as improbable and/or gramatically incorrect. Austin Dickinson (vocalist) as redirect already exists. Quis separabit? 14:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zombi (2012 Video Game)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 11#Zombi (2012 Video Game)

Psychoheresy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation if the term becomes sourced somewhere after everything is sorted out (see Uanfala's comment). -- Tavix (talk) 17:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The connection to anti-psychology or anti-psychiatry appears to be original research. The inventors of this neologism object to this connection. The term is not notable as was already recognized. I see no suitable article to redirect to. Sondra.kinsey (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, nothing was merged. Antipsychology was defined as specifically Christian already, and then an IP rewrote the thing to eliminate any reference to that a year later or so. Just today it was redirected to anti-psychiatry, again without any merger. If there's any relevant material in the last, it's purely by coincidence. Seyasirt (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This will not do. The proposed target is about analysis of religion from a (secularized) psychological viewpoint, whereas psychoheresy is about the religious problems of practicing psychology within a Christian framework. They are almost completely reversed from one another. Seyasirt (talk) 13:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why? This seems to be covered in the subsection Psychology of religion#Religion and psychotherapy AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
... which shouldn't be there, but in a separate article. For all I know, it might even exist already, but this obviously doesn't belong in an article which says, in the first sentence, that it is about psychologial analysis of religion. Seyasirt (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wally Grant

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move Wally Grant (ice hockey) over Wally Grant, retarget Wallace Grant to Wally Grant, and delete Wally Grant (disambiguation) (G6). -- Tavix (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wally Grant was a one-entry DAB page which I've turned into a redirect. I propose: swap the two pages round. Narky Blert (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Additional - to be consistent, Wallace Grant should redirect to the hockey player. I'm nominating Wallace Grant. I hope Narky Blert is okay with this. - Richard Cavell (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Richardcavell: Well spotted & absolutely fine by me - Grant isn't mentioned in the Virginia Tech article. Narky Blert (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Folkloric Tradition

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Folklore of the United States as I find no consensus to delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an unlikely search term. The original text was migrated to American Folkloric Witchcraft which is itself currently at AfD. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support the lower-case version of that. Striking above vote. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lohengrin: An Opera

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term and unused variation of the work's title, apparently created to make a WP:POINT in an unrelated discussion at Talk:Trump Tower: A Novel#Requested move 20 June 2017. — JFG talk 06:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More