The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Default to keep. Deryck C. 14:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Squirrel-sponsored cyberterrorism → Electrical disruptions caused by squirrels  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Obvious joke. KMF (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep it was obvioudly not a joke, it was the actual original title of the article and the concept is thoroughly discussed there. Nominator presents no other case to answer. Ribbet32 (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Enigma^msg 03:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It is true that squirrels can disrupt a power grid or computer network. But they are not sponsoring terrorism. The term is obviously humorous, but it's not up to us to create and propagate it. - Richard Cavell (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the word "sponsored" is what is inaccurate. Squirrels don't sponsor any such activities, nor are deployed to do as such. Original article was created on June 6. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — This was the original title of the article, but is not likely to be a useful/plausible redirect in the long term. —PaleoNeonate - 18:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not a joke, I think, but the redirect isn't plausible. As others said, it's not cyberterrorism and it isn't "sponsored" by squirrels. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 23:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now. Although this is a phrase that doesn't get many ghits, it was the article's title for 19 days until a move executed a week ago, and there are incoming external links [1]. – Uanfala 08:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, so long as the article continues to make reference to such: Squirrels mobilize, plot acts of cyber terrorism against humankind - And they're not acting alone. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Owen Vaccaro → Daddy's Home (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect was blanked by Albertod4 with the rationale "Owen Vaccaro should not redirect to Daddy's Home. He's been in other films (e.g., Mother's Day)". Since the blanking was obviously improper, I'm taking it here for them. Unless I comment otherwise, I'm neutral. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The subject has appeared in seven films, and one, two Atlanta-based publications, as well as HNGN, and IAAM, and has 2673 Twitter followers. Does this meet our standards for notability? - Richard Cavell (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete actor is not strongly tied to this film. Should Owen meet notability later, an article can be created. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per AngusWOOF, non-notable actor who has now appeared in more than one film. Sro23 (talk) 23:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:41, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Compulsive Wikipedia Editing Syndrome → Obsessive–compulsive disorder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, seems to be WP:MADEUP in order to make the user template ((User CWES)). I'd like to see all links removed rather than piped to Obsessive–compulsive disorder as I don't think it's appropriate to connect a made-up "syndrome" with a serious mental disorder. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete could be an interesting essay though if it were preceded by "WP:" AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • There does exist a somewhat similar essay: Wikipedia:Obsessive Compulsive Disorder editors. – Uanfala 22:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - A Wikipedia centric term that has no business pointing to a non-Wikipedia related article and would not be appropriate as a cross namespace redirect. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 04:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - at best, it's original research. At worst, it's a joke. My notion of "delete" does not extend to the userbox. - Richard Cavell (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No MEDRS confirms that it is a real syndrome, thus equating this "joke" with a real psychological diagnosis is simply not acceptable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete and retarget to List of characters in The Lego Movie#Princess Unikitty, respectively. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Young Vitruvius → The Lego Movie Videogame  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Princess Uni-Kitty → The Lego Movie Videogame  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as WP:GAMEGUIDE, or else it could easily link to The Lego Movie, or a respective character list, if there is. Lordtobi (✉) 20:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List_of_characters_in_The_Lego_Movie#Vitruvius and List_of_characters_in_The_Lego_Movie#Princess_Unikitty respectively as this has the most detail for The Lego Movie characters. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget the princess per AngusWOOF, unsure about the other one: the proposed target talks of Vitruvius and makes no mention of a young Vitruvius. – Uanfala 10:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If Vitruvius as a child is a significant character (starring voice role), then Retarget, but if it's just a brief or passing flashback, then forget it. Also there is a Vitruvius historical figure. I don't see a young version in The Lego Movie. [2] Also note the voices aren't confirmed in the video game only the movie itself [3] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it will be notable for the companion video game, so recommend delete on Young Vitruvius. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:57, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Lego indy 2 → Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, unlikely search term. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep helpful shortcut for the game or media title. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There's a disagreement as to where this would be retargeted, and a majority in favour of deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• LGBT liberal politics → LGBT conservatism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect does not make sense and there does not seem to be an appropriate target available. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Possible Retarget to List of LGBT organizations that affiliate with political parties AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:49, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - we don't have LGBT politics, Gay politics, Queer politics, etc. I slightly prefer the target List of LGBT rights organizations for the nominated redirect, but otherwise I'm with AngusWOOF. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - We should probably have a broad concept article with a title along the lines of 'Liberalism and LGBT rights' or something like that. The page would delve into the historical trends within classical liberal thought about sexuality as well as what modern, progressive parties have done recently. Such an article doesn't (I think) exist. Right now, we don't really have a particularly close target available. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pointing "liberal" to "conservative" without a clear explanation at the target is astonishing. Deryck C. 14:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There's been a lot of chatter regarding potentially retargeting this and covering it somewhere, but it appears that hasn't happen. As such, I'm closing this without prejudice against recreation if the term is to be sourced somewhere. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Irish tea shop → Taoiseach  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Perhaps at least some people using this redirect may be disappointed when they are redirected to a political article instead of one about tea? What's the likelihood of this being a real spelling error? AmaryllisGardener ^talk 00:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It needs a better connection than someone commenting in a tweet. [4] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Considering that was tweeted by Stephen Fry, I highly doubt that "error" was made in anything but satire. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 02:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Not sure whether Fry's satirical joke has encyclopedic value, but WP:BLP should be enforced. Must be cautious about redirecting the page to either Stephen Fry or Leo Varadkar. If neither is a suitable target, not sure about tea house#Europe, which doesn't mention Ireland. If that won't work, then delete without prejudice to re-creation to another target w/o retargeting to the same page. George Ho (talk) 10:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - here's evidence of journalists reporting on Stephen Fry's quip: Daily Edge and Evoke. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• If something like this is to be covered on Wikipedia, Fine Gael leadership election, 2017 may be an appropriate location. feminist 02:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Taldren → Star Trek: Starfleet Command  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Taldren, Inc. → Star Trek: Starfleet Command  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. Terms do not appear in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep seems to be an affiliated developer for the series. [5] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Developer actually made at least three of these games according to MobyGames. Per Angus' link, another unrelated game was in development hell before getting canceled. Perhaps delete to encourage article creation? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. I'm not 100% convinced that this company is notable, though I wouldn't be opposed to keeping this redirect if info about the company was added to the target article. FYI, Taldren, Inc. is a redirect that sends readers to the same article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added the second one. UnitedStatesian (talk) 11:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under G7. ℯxplicit 07:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Maroz → Mroz  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Page created by error Hergilei (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.