< May 30
June 1 >

May 31

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 31, 2017.

8 rock

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CentreGold

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CentreGold was acquired by Eidos Interactive in April 1996, though most of it was stripped shortly after (U.S. Gold was dissolved immediately, CentreSoft was sold in July, Silicon Dreams Studio was sold in December, leaving only Core Design, which was kept until being sold in 2006). The holding company CentreGold itself only continues to functions as legal trademark holder, but is no longer active and was considered part of Eidos for not even a year. Apparently there formerly was a section titled "Beginnings and company growth", but that is no longer present, and term is not spelled out once in the article. If we were to redirect it to U.S. Gold or Silicon Dreams Studio, WP:XY would apply, pretty much, so I'd rather say delete to avoid further confusion on the topic. Lordtobi (✉) 18:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rich Edson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move draft over redirect and add hanote. Thryduulf (talk) 11:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this guy at Fox News AmaryllisGardener talk 16:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Catagory:Rooster Teeth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in namespace identifier; implausible. – Train2104 (t • c) 14:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daily Wail

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 00:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary due to lack of links, per previous RfDs and Daily Heil etc. WikipediaUserCalledChris (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) Edit: Almost forgot, I had a discussion with the admin who deleted two redirects, and the admin said that re-creating them is okay. George Ho (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC); edited. 20:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's Green's Dictionary of Slang, not OED. Bromley86 (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad. George Ho (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

健肺村

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese-language nickname. Literally means "clean lung village" because "someone pronouncing the name of the village would need a high lung capacity". Probably not worth mentioning at the target article. feminist 10:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grand Cote (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 00:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The target has been moved to Grande Côte (disambiguation) (with an "e"). This redirect serves no useful purpose, is an unlikely search term, and has no incoming links. "Grand Cote" itself is not ambiguous and Grand Cote redirects correctly to Grand Cote National Wildlife Refuge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf: and @Richardcavell: OK, but the target has moved. "Keep" would create a double redirect to a target that is both with a diacritic and a different spelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to the new final target, which is Grande with an 'e'. - Richard Cavell (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PRESENT

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move PRESENT (cipher) over redirect. Deryck C. 17:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

XNR shortcut that doesn't match WP:PRESENT. Either this should retarget to Present, or its target should match that of WP:PRESENT. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's embarrassing. My intention was for WP:PRESENT. But I see it's being used. Requesting the page be moved to WP:TVPRESENT or something similar. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bernadette Austin-Bower

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Non notable (perhaps her daughter?) redirect set up by a sock in order to funnel searches to an attack page that he set up (which has since been edited into line with WP:BLP). Bromley86 (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, found connection. She is Gamboa's daughter according to the wedding announcement. [4] however she is still low-profile as Wikipedia notability is not inherited. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

October 10, 2010

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 13#October 10, 2010

Template:Löschen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED...we don't have other languages' equivalents of CSD redirecting here. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

First photograph of the whole illuminated Earth taken from space, Apollo 17, resulting in the famous "Blue Marble" photograph, said to have been at least partly responsible for launching the modern environmental movement.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's absolutely no reason to have such an absurdly long redirect. AmaryllisGardener talk 01:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the caption [6] "View of the Earth as seen by the Apollo 17 crew traveling toward the moon" This redirect should be renamed to that. But this version doesn't serve anyone. Changed vote to delete. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

After Prom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion[edit]

Here's my next batch of problematic film redirects. These redirects target a director, actor, etc. that was rumored to be a part of a potential film. The problem, however, is that there is zero mention of such a film at the target, so anybody who wants to know more about these potential films will end up confused or disappointed. Most of these films are in development hell. They may or may not progress to production, and the director, actors, production studio, etc. could all change before then. Therefore, these redirects need to be red for now. If any of these enter production, then an article on the film can be created. Until then, these redirects aren't helpful. (raw list available on talk page) -- Tavix (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Top Gun 2(film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful redirects because there are spaces missing before "(", Top Gun 2 (film) already exists as a redirect to the same target, and Draft:Top Gun 2 (film) already exists as a redirect to a different target, Draft:Top Gun 2. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hell's Bible

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus default to keep. Editors arguing for "delete" said this redirect title is not discussed at the target article, whereas editors arguing for "keep" said this is an attested nickname of the newspaper. Deryck C. 17:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete or re-target to The Satanic Bible. I can find no reason why this redirects to The New York Times. Eddie891 (talk) 01:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The blog posts seem to be unofficial ones with the word Catholic in it, none of which show up when I click the "news" tab in that Google search. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More