The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You Don't Know Jack! Mock 2 → You Don't Know Jack (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Game not titled with exclamation mark, unlikely search term (and would else appear in the exact same game table) Lordtobi (✉) 21:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Product never had the exclamation point, and there's no point in making redirects for every installment in the series. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. I don't think the exclamation point is all that implausible, and the page view statistics show a steady stream of one or two hits every other day or so. Nevertheless, I am confident the search function will direct readers to the appropriate article. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Berkeley Systems. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• BeZerk → You Don't Know Jack (video game series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not related to the video game series Lordtobi (✉) 21:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Berkeley Systems which hosted beZerk.com and the You Don't Know Jack series was its main product [1] [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Angus. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 14:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Scotty Doesn't Know. I am closing this discussion early since the current setup was the result of RussBot correcting a double redirect after Scotty Doesn't Know was blanked and redirected to EuroTrip in 2006. At this point, executing the nominator's proposal is essentially uncontroversial cleanup. (Note: The article at Scotty Doesn't Know was merged and redirected to EuroTrip as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotty Doesn't Know, a discussion that happened in 2006; the article was restored in 2010. The close of this RfD discussion is cleanup only, and in no way is intended to supersede the result of the AfD discussion.) (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 15:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I retargeted Scotty Doesn't Know (Song) to Scotty Doesn't Know as a result of this discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Scotty Doesn't Know (song) → EuroTrip  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Article named Scotty Doesn't Know already exists and is also linked in EuroTrip. This redirect is redundant MartinezMD (talk) 03:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom I've pointed it to the song and added R from unnecessary disambiguation. Any there any other media that could be confused with this? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Justification (jurisprudence) because I do not find consensus to delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Unjust crime → Crime  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The phrase "unjust crime" is not identified in the target article, nor is the word "unjust" mentioned in the target article. This phrase seems as though it might relate to False accusation, but I'm not completely sold on that at the moment. Steel1943 (talk) 21:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Justification (jurisprudence) which is where Just crime redirects. Add ((R from antonym)) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I have usually seen sources use the phrase "unjust crime" as just another colorful expression for criminal activity. See this example from the Congressional Record, where it refers to human trafficking as an "unjust crime." That said, we don't need to include every euphemism or every colorful phrase in this encyclopedia. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Miscarriage of justice as the redirect's title is pretty much the subject of the article, more or less. ToThAc (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, can't see how this would actually be used separately from linking directly to Crime.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Justification (jurisprudence) per AngusWOOF. Sure, it's commonly used as a colourful phrase, but the root of that use stems from the fact that legally, there are some crimes which as "just crimes". I would oppose targeting to Miscarriage of justice, since that is not a crime. Maybe something like unjust conviction could point there, but not this redirect. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree with AngusWOOF. "Unjust crime" is not a tautology if one is considering higher-level questions about what the legal system ought to do, and that is the subject matter of jurisprudence. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.