The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Pile of Poo emoji. Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Pile of poo → Feces  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Someone searching for "Pile of poo" is almost certainly searching for the Pile of Poo emoji rather than actual poop. Suggest changing as such. Home Lander (talk) 23:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as by far the most likely target. For those wanting to find out what a "pile of poo" is in the world outside online communication, the first sentence of the article provides the necessary definition and link to feces. – Uanfala (talk) 23:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom, and add a hatnote to the new target if necessary. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 00:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to Pile of Poo emoji per WP:RECENTISM and likely search topic, but yes, a hatnote would help. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget - Retarget to Pile of Poo emoji. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:49, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Byzantine Empire+ → Byzantine Empire  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 21:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I also miss the point here. Home Lander (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: utterly useless. Constantine ✍ 23:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget/speedy delete.

• Retarget +X to Plus-X
• Retarget +x to Plus-X
• Retarget +× to Plus-X
• Speedy delete +x (album)
• Speedy delete X (Martin Garrix album)
• Speedy delete +x (Martin Garrix album)

Plus-X now contains a link to Martin Garrix. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• +X → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• +x → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• +× → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• +x (album) → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• X (Martin Garrix album) → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• +x (Martin Garrix album) → Martin Garrix discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Irrelevant to the article, it's a fan made title of a non-existent album that was scheduled for release in 2016 but never happened. Deletion reasons #1 and #2 - the redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine, and might cause confusion. — Zawl 20:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• How about redirecting to the dab page at Plus-X? – Uanfala (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect to Plus-X. Garrix can be recognized somewhat by "+x". --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• It's misleading because +x is ambiguous and has more relevance in topics like Unix and mathematics. — Zawl 17:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an entry for chmod in the Plus-X dab page. That's probably the most often used system call. Was there another function in math or system call computer science that uses this? I don't see it in List of mathematical symbols AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget +X and +x to Plus-X as a plausible variant. Delete +× since it uses a multiplication sign that is hard to type. Retarget +× to Martin Garrix per AngusWOOF's findings, Delete those with disambiguation per WP:CRYSTAL and nom. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC) edited 00:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - Redirect +×, +X and +x to Plus-X per WP:CHEAP, delete redirects containing the word "album". --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Since you created those redirects, I'm going to go ahead and invoke WP:G7 and speedily delete them. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete these were created specifically for the Martin Garrix album which did not manifest. The other products were never known by the +x symbol, Kodak shows PX instead. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Plus-X and add entry for Martin Garrix. The +× is for Martin Garrix. He's using it extensively and actively as his logo [1] as of 2015, so it's not an album. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated Martin Garrix's article to include the shortened logo which was available on commons. Also added to Plus-X Up to you all if you want to keep or delete the cross symbol version, although that's the stylization he is preferring. Some news coverage [2] [3] [4] Also seemed to be an album name in 2015, but has since been abandoned. [5] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per U1. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Metiscus/sandbox/Albert A. Mullin → Albert_A._Mullin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete this redirect. It is left over from me creating this page in my sandbox and I don't think it should exist anymore. Metiscus (talk) 20:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Free France. Hatnote added. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Les Français Libres → Aymeric Chauprade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] PRehse (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment PRehse, please provide a rationale or this may be closed per WP:SPEEDYKEEP. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target but possible a retarget to Free France (as below with The Free French.PRehse (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget - This absolutely needs to go over to 'Free France'. I'm surprised that it doesn't already. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• As the creator, I'd probably agree with the above/retarget to Free France. Mélencron (talk) 02:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Chauprade's article has a line about founding a Les Français Libres in 2015. Is that another political movement then? Should there be a hatnote? The 2015 movement or party has no article though. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Free France. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The Free French → Aymeric Chauprade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not in target but possible a retarget to Free France PRehse (talk) 17:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget over to 'Free France'. Even if this isn't formatted probably due to the definite article, the association of the term 'Free French' with the historical Forces françaises libres is so strong that I believe the redirect is worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:15, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• As the creator, I'd probably agree with the above/retarget to Free France. Mélencron (talk) 02:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nous Citoyens → Jean-Marie Cavada  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not in target PRehse (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• There is an article about this political party at w:fr:Nous Citoyens, but since we do not currently have an article on its founder, Denis Payre, we should delete this for now. No objection to recreation as an article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Non-A.I. → Artificial intelligence  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not in target and too obscure to be a reasonable search term PRehse (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Doesn't seem to be helpful to readers as a ((R from antonym)). "Non-AI decision making" is apparently an actual thing [6] and not covered at the target. Also, the most common meaning in Wikipedia (at least without the dots) is "non-aperture indexing". 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it's rather vague. There is a concept of Non-sentient AI which could go to Artificial intelligence in fiction#Non-sentient AI, but that's a stretch for this search, and there's no discussion of a non-AI in the AI article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is vague to the point that I don't think trying to parse out a meaning makes sense. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.