< October 9
October 11 >

October 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 10, 2018.

Kronborg(god)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the missing space before the parenthetical disambiguator, I don't see any indication from the target or from Google that this Slavic mythological figure (or any figure of any mythology) has ever been known by this Danish name. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hyperactive Children's Support Group

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This organization is not mentioned at the target article and therefore the redirect serves no purpose (and may even mislead the reader). Peacock (talk) 21:11, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wenyi Fuxing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration of the Chinese 文藝復興 (wén yì fù xīng) meaning "renaissance". Sam Sailor 19:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

we have a metro station of Zhongxiao Fuxing or Nanjing FuxingWifik3r8bLk2Zr (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shirley Roberts

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Thryduulf (talk) 17:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, not mentioned in target article. DuncanHill (talk) 00:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment that section is completely unreferenced. I came across the redirect as I was looking for an article on a biographer cited in another article. DuncanHill (talk) 13:29, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing this out. I've added an IMDb reference to that article. Apparently most of the voice actors on that series worked pseudonymously due to union rules. Such presumably impermanent pseudonyms probably produce plenty of unpreventable redirects. --pmj (talk) 23:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
IMDb is not a reliable source though. We need Tweets or official website material that connects Barbara Goodson to Shirley Roberts, or optionally via Marie Crystal (her character in Robotech Masters). [2] There is a Shirley Roberts listed in the voice actor credits for Robotech. [3] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to avoid the mess that was generated from indirect references like Talk:Rebecca_Soler#Revisiting_Jessica_Paquet_as_alias_for_Soler which had to be resolved with an OTRS. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:00, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:20, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

What Can't Be Said

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no mention of redirect on target page, formerly redirected to a redlink album. No better or suitable target can be found. Richhoncho (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BLADE RUNNER (1982)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a Blade Runner 1982 page (note lower caps). No need for a page that has BLADE RUNNER in capitals. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The ((R from move)) was the nominator trying to move the redirect around (which doesn't work and messes up the history). I did what I could to fix it, so that shouldn't be a problem moving forward. Just to note, the target article was never at this title. -- Tavix (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You made it redirect to a redirect, I've fixed it now. Jonpatterns (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to pi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. While consensus here is to keep these, I want to note a few points. There's clearly some appetite for limiting the number of these, but I can't find a consensus here (or in past discussions) that create a solid rule. Lengthwise, 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 is the outlier, as the next-longest was previously kept. Another suggestion is for common calculator limits (the rationale behind the creation of the above, I'll note), but that seems too fluid (to round or not to round?). A third is only the "correct" ones, which likewise is subjective. At any rate, there's no consensus to limit creation here, but the strength of the consensus is in usefulness. This should not be interpreted as a mandate to create the many "missing" redirects with fewer than 30 decimals.
I'll also note that none of these were tagged appropriately, but given the discussion and the outcome, this can stand as in-process. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Another round of pi redirects. Anything beyond 3.14159 is an implausible search term. And yes, there was a pi redirect in Draft: for some reason. ONR (talk) 09:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The draft one is abandoned so I added G13 to it.– BrandonXLF (t@lk) 01:52, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spartan Stadium (San Jose, California

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Per Bobak. Note: I closed the Genie (feral child RfD, and I continue to find the argument convincing (and surprising!). ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, everyone should read the discussion on the talkpage; it's not often we have those here. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing a closing parenthesis. The proper redirect Spartan Stadium (San Jose, California) exists, so there is no reason to keep this one around. ONR (talk) 09:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

James-Honey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This name isn't mentioned in the target anywhere, even without the hyphen. Pretty implausible search term. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:45, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hp

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 October 21#Hp

SeaMonkey-ko

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Former redirect to Moe anthropomorphism. Delete Largely forgotten character, originally a redirect to a section for a Mozilla-related anime girl that was redirected and protected 10 years ago. No content within either current article; implausible search term. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 18:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More