The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest 2020 → Norway in the Eurovision Song Contest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Portugal in the Eurovision Song Contest 2020 → Portugal in the Eurovision Song Contest  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:TOOSOON: not mentioned in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Votes for keep → Wikipedia:Deletion process  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Useless and implausible redirect. I don't understand how this redirect is useful in any way. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep seems like a very useful link for people who aren't familiar with the way deletion processes work on Wikipedia - someone looking at an AfD will see lots of what looks like votes for keeping the article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Thryduulf: I disagree. They both don't link together. In the last year there are two views for this redirect so it is not helpful in any way. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as appears implausible, especially with such low page views. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It might be old and venerable, but judging by its history, it was created in error: I don't think anyone would intentionally create a redirect with an ungrammatical title that makes it implausible as a search term (even in the context of the older days when AfD was called "Votes for Deletion"). – Uanfala (talk) 11:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No incoming links, and a rather confusing title. I mean technically, anything not up for deletion is figuratively being voted for keep by the community. Steel1943 (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Section renamed January 2008, since removed ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Quote whore → Film criticism#"Quote whoring"  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Quote Whore → Film criticism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Targeted section has been removed, and the term no longer appears in the targeted article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Slogan 'AIDS Kills Fags Dead' → Anti-LGBT rhetoric  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Slogan:A woman's right to choose → Abortion debate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete because the preceding "Slogan" and each one's punctuation makes both of these unlikely search terms. Nominating one with the colon and one without the colon but with quotation marks; assuming delete consensus develops I will nominate the other 30 or so redirects that follow one or the other forms. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as to both. We don't have a "Slogan" namespace. Note that the versions of the slogans without the word "Slogan" and the unnecessary punctuation will continue to point to their respective targets. bd2412 T 20:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as implausible. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 21:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both as above as they aren't ever referred to with Slogan as the lead word. Perhaps if the slogan was added to the end, but usually the phrase itself would have a match before needing to add slogan. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Big Cottonwvood Canyon Road → Utah State Route 190  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

If this had been caught 8 years ago it would have been an obvious WP:R3. The v in Cottonwvood makes this an implausible redirect. It would be plausible if it wasn't there. ~ GB fan 12:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Note also that a correctly-spelled redirect already exists. LJ ↗ 17:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The Joy Bejar Show → Joy Behar: Say Anything!  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible misspelling of Joy Behar's last name. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.