The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Vidya gaem → Video game  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect, not a likely search term. This redirect also contains multiple typos. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 23:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Web search indicates that this is an attested internet meme/alternate spelling, and apparently also the name of an "award" that is has been running among 4chan users since 2011. Certainly not super notable but redirects are cheap. BlackholeWA (talk) 08:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per BlackholeWA. Though I personally wouldn't oppose deletion either. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 10:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:Thanos(Marvel Cinematic Universe) → Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect with a typo (no space between title and dab). Draft:Thanos (Marvel Cinematic Universe) already exists if the draft redirect is needed. Gonnym (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep ((R from move)) from when it was created at this title. Redirects from Draft space to a directly relevant article are harmless even with typos. Thryduulf (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep per Thryduulf. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox 2011-2012 Bahraini uprising → Bahraini uprising of 2011  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Template:Infobox 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising → Bahraini uprising of 2011  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

unused, cross namespace and target has different time frame TerraCyprus (talk) 23:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If you delete this without also deleting Template:Infobox 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising, AnomieBOT will recreate it. Anomie⚔ 00:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The target article used to have its infobox existing separately in the template space, but that got merged back after this 2017 TfD. The history of the template has been moved to the redirect Bahraini protests of 2011–13 summary, but there are several other template redirects left behind: Template:Infobox 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising, Template:Infobox Bahraini uprising (2011-), Template:Infobox Bahraini uprising (2011-present), Template:Infobox Bahraini uprising (2011–), and Template:Infobox Bahraini uprising (2011–present). Frietjes, what are your thoughts? – Uanfala (talk) 00:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all of the misplaced template redirects. Articles are not infoboxes and should not be referred to as infoboxes. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, no history there. it looks like there may have been a history merge at one point, but that history is not in this redirect, so can be safely deleted. Frietjes (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Note: Template talk:Infobox 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising redirects to Talk:Bahraini protests of 2011–13 summary, a different target to the main redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. No longer a redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024 Queensland state election → Queensland Government  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Someone searching for this title would be unlikely to be looking for the Queensland Government article, especially since the target makes no mention of the 2024 Queensland election. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 02:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wait This election will be to the Legislative Assembly of Queensland, but there is no mention of it there and no general Elections in Queensland or List of elections in Queensland article I've found. There will very likely be an article about the election when it happens, based on 2020 Queensland state election and previous editions all having articles (see Category:Elections in Queensland. This means it is a very likely search term that we should have content on somewhere, but I'm not sure where. At the moment we likely can't say much beyond it's scheduled to happen, but when the results from the 2020 election are finalised (before the end of this RFD I guess) that will start to change, so my suggestion is not to rush, leave it a week or so and then see where things are. Thryduulf (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, and per WP:REDLINK since it sounds like it's almost time to have an actual article on the topic per Thryduulf. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw: Redirect has now been replaced with a full article. This RFD discussion is therefore moot, and I move to withdraw it. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 23:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete 2015, keep 2016. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• XXX (2015 film) → XXX (web series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• XXX (2016 film) → XXX (web series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are no 2015 or 2016 films named "XXX", nor are they mentioned on the DAB page. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The article makes it clear that the film was not released in 2015 or 2016. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 2015, but Keep 2016. The article makes it clear that the film was scheduled to be released in 2016 and so there will likely be sources out there written before the delay that talked about it as a 2016 film. The same is not true of 2015 however. Thryduulf (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the 2016 one, but delete 2015. Target article clearly indicates that this film was supposed to be released in 2016. No reason for keeping the 2015 one, though. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.