The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --Tavix(talk) 23:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 21:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don’t agree that it is commonly used, it has had 674 views over the past ~5 years (and around 50 of those have been while this RfD has been open) , while Miley Cyrus has had over 30 million. I’m also not sure what purpose it serves, as surely someone who can search for this spoonerism is capable of reversing it and thereby getting the correct title? ƒirefly ( t · c ) 23:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not like it's harming anything and it has saved time for 600 people at the very least. 600 people helped is a lot in the context of misnomer redirects. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Matt Halprin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguilltalk 21:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
File:W. S. Gilbert - Alice B. Woodward - The Pinafore Picture Book - Frontispiece - Original.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
File:Mitre 10 Dream Home logo
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused File: redirect with no foreseeable use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 16:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. CrazyBoy826 19:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jews against Zionism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Deletion. As per WP:RfD#DELETE If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. The redirect is a campaign group; the target article mentions the philosophy and another group but not this one NOTE lower case a in against; a UK secular group, not the book or the US based religious group. Jontel (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Jews Against Zionism, a book with this title that is hat noted to the article on Jewish anti Zionism. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Anti-Zionism#Jewish anti-Zionism has extensive content on Jewish anti-Zionism, did the nominator fail to read the section in the target?--Hippeus (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Buttons for Eyes (film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. This did not need to be relisted. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not a nickname by which the film is called, nor was it a working title. I'm sure anyone looking for "that film where people have buttons for eyes" could Google it and find the Wikipedia article. Dominicmgm (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete there are lots of references to this film when searching for "Buttons for eyes" on google and excluding Wikipedia, but at least most of them are using it as a descriptor not a name and there are a nearly equal number of hits for other things such as using buttons for eyes of soft toys. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoristalk! 00:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.