The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:trifurcation. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Trifurcation → False dilemma  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to wikt:trifurcation, which describes this word. Duckmather (talk) 04:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect to wikt:trifurcation per Duckmather. The article used to mention the word until it was removed in April 2008, so it hasn't been mentioned for years, thus not making sense now a little over fifteen years later. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 06:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft Redirect per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect, using ((Wiktionary redirect)): it meets the criteria for an appropriate Wiktionary redirect listed on the template page. – Uanfala (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect to wikt:trifurcation per above. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Jake chudnow → Vsauce#Jake Chudnow  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nominated at CSD with the rationale "target topic not mentioned at redirect" by 193.115.126.135 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). I removed the CSD tag as it's not a speedy delete criterion, but it is a valid reason for deletion from RfD unless an alternate solution can be found. (Note Jake Chudnow does not exist – however was deleted via WP:A7 in 2014 – and this page was created in 2021 as a redirect to Vsauce). TartarTorte 18:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no mention at the target. Veverve (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete According to my Google Search, the artist seems to be affiliated with other youtubers aside from Vsauce so this redirect might be confusing. No prejudice on the creation of the artist's article should he meet en.wiki's notability standards. --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• List of liberation theologians → Liberation theology#Liberation theologians  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Targets a section which does not exist anymore. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Category:Liberation theologians, although it might be bad Wikipedia style to redirect a list to a category. Duckmather (talk) 19:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Target is not a list, nor about theologians. — HTGS (talk) 01:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The List of Dictators → Dictator  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=delete&page=List_of_dictators. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: misleading, the target is not a list. Veverve (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Dronebogus (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. No prejudice on the creation of an actual list article in the future. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not sure about that considering what is stated (linked) in the nomination. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, that's the future list creator's challenge if they want to take it on. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• A list of all death metal bands → List of death metal bands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. Surely there's no list on Wikipedia containing all death metal bands in existence. This page should have been deleted upon creation rather than being redirected. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Wikipedia:Complete list. Duckmather (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete illogical search term, and obviously not true Dronebogus (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: an unlikely and illogical search term, and, as pointed out above, also very misleading. WP:NCLL clearly states to avoid this kind of titling ("...avoid titles like List of all Xs."). Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as misleading --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• A list of minor characters in the Yu-Gi-Oh! GX anime and manga series → List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX characters#Minor characters  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Full sentence, unlikely search term. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete extremely unlikely search term Dronebogus (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because it is an unlikely search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wesleyan theology. Jay 💬 14:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wesleyism → Methodism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should probably target the same article as Wesleyanism. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support retargetting to Wesleyanism per nom. Veverve (talk) 15:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per obvious Dronebogus (talk) 23:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support (Retarget to Wesleyan theology) per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Wesleyan theology (which is what I think others mean). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, this is what I meant. Veverve (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I've clarified my vote. Good catch. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Trignonmetric Ratios → Trigonometric ratios  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as implausible typo D.Lazard (talk) 11:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: error, capitalisation, double redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).