The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Given this has made it into print, it’s reasonable enough for us to forward anyone along. Courcelles (talk) 22:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Ibrah m c Abd al-Maj d → Ibrahim Abdel Meguid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned on target page, does not seem to be a plausible typo. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a spelling used in the Encyclopedia of African Literature, by Simon Gikandi.

"Born in Alexandria, the Egyptian novelist and short story writer Ibrah m c Abd al-Maj d has published nine novels and four collections of short stories."

Its an important source for african literatura, i created the redirection with the intention of facilitating discoverability for someone that comes from it JoaquimCebuano (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep and tag as ((R from incorrect spelling)). See Google Books for what this looks like in print. Two letters in the poor man's name have been mojibaked away or something, and the typesetter really used a superscript c in place of the correct modifier letter left half ring to transcribe ع, but printed typos should probably be regarded as likely search terms. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Skim milk marriage → United States v. Windsor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete- apparent nonsense, created in 2013 as the only edit by this user, without expanation. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC) [reply]
Keep - it is probably a reference to this: [1] [2] Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Procedural close. This is no longer a redirect. Courcelles (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Lady apple → Syzygium suborbiculare  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Procedurally nominating on behalf of Evedawn99, who blanked the redirect claiming There is nothing in the article that claims that people refer to Syzygium suborbiculare as "lady apple." "Lady apple" commonly refers to a different type of apple: the french Nome Api * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – "Lady apple" is indeed used in reference to that species, and I have expanded the article with an additional source where it is used. However, a search in Google Books seems to show that the Api variety of apples is indeed the primary topic. Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article on Api apples (other than Api Etoile, which is a specific type of Api apples and doesn't seem like an appropriate target for the query), so there's nothing else that it could refer to. Randi Moth (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for now per Randi Moth's rationale above. Let's revisit this redirect once the Nome Api article is created. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural close – Lady apple has been turned into an article on the cultivar by Evedawn99 while this discussion was ongoing, and so any further discussion regarding the article's current state no longer falls under the scope of RFD. Randi Moth (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete in accordance with WP:G7. (non-admin closure) Randi Moth (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• ProJared → Game Shakers#Production  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is not reasonable, as most people looking for ProJared here aren't looking for Game Shakers. My suggestion is delete until the Draft:ProJared is published. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 14:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete seems reasonable – subject is only loosely associated with the TV comedy. In fact, the so-called "source" used at the article to "verify" his presence doesn't even name him – it just includes a picture. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Krakua-Toa of Sonics → Bionicle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Krakua → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Dume → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Jovan → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Kaita → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa of Light → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa types by year → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa-Mahri → TOA  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Inika → Bionicle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Kongu → Bionicle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Toa Nuva → Bionicle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirects for fictional characters in the Lego Bionicle franchise. After the AfDs for the character list and for the the toa race, it appears unlikely that Wikipedia will ever have any content about them. Of these, only Toa Nuva has a passing mention in the target article. Four of these (Krakua, Toa of Light, Toa types by year and Toa-Mahri) started out as articles in the early days of the encyclopedia, but they all got promptly redirected at the time. – Uanfala (talk) 13:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. BD2412 T 14:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Half-Life (video game). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• HECU → Half-Life (series)#Hazardous Environment Combat Unit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hazardous Environment Combat Unit → Half-Life (series)#Hazardous Environment Combat Unit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect topic is mentioned nowhere in the target page. WikiMic talk 12:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Half-Life (video game) where it is mentioned -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per 65.92.244.151. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per the above. - Eureka Lott 01:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Moldovan protests (2022–present ) → Moldovan protests (2022–present)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

User who moved 2022–2023 Moldovan protests to Moldovan protests (2022–present) left an unnecessary space. Super Ψ Dro 12:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete classic WP:RDAB. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 08:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Moldovan (2022–present ) → Moldovan protests (2022–present )  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

User who moved 2022–2023 Moldovan protests to Moldovan protests (2022–present) made an error. Super Ψ Dro 12:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete classic WP:RDAB. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) EpicPupper (talk) 21:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Donation (in Canon Law) → Donation (Catholic canon law)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The two capital letters make this redirect quite unhelpful. Veverve (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This is the Catholic Encyclopedia title. Isn't there a practice that CE titles are good candidates for redirects as someone's likely to recreate it again at another time? Not particularly fussed otherwise. JASpencer (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't know if that's true, however, the all lowercase Donation (in canon law) exists; a quirk of Wikipedia is that if only the lowercase exists the uppercase will be treated as though it isn't capitalised. (eg. Fishing Gear does not exist, but if you try searching it instead of linking it you will get redirected via Fishing gear.) Unless I'm mistaken, even if this is deleted if someone were to search this it would take them where they want to go even if they used the caps so I'm not sure why they would want to recreate it. – Scyrme (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a reasonable search term in light of its use in the Catholic Encyclopedia as the title for this subject. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I don't see anything from WP:RDEL that applies to deleting this. Concur with Red-tailed hawk. -2pou (talk) 19:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Super Famicom Box → Super Nintendo Entertainment System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. Apparently, this was a version of the SNES used in hotels. It seems like reliable sources don’t mention this obscure console either. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 15:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This redirect was a result of this AFD. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 15:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:51, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment @Edittac, Namcokid47, and Adamant1: PING the participants at the AfD that resulted in this redirect -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• The AfD participants recommended merging, the closer suggested merging is optional, and the AfD and RfD nominators suggest that there are no reliable sources that can help in a merge. Delete because of Box in the title. Otherwise we already have redirects Super Famicom, The Super Famicom and Nintendo Super Famicom which will help readers reach the target. Jay 💬 06:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 10:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• CNZ Communications → KOFY-TV  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While KOFY-TV is owned by CNZ Communications (and this is mentioned in the article), it is not the company's only station (it's not even their only San Francisco station). The group does not appear to have a clear "flagship" station, so a redirect to any of their stations might seem misleading. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 06:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. It remains unclear why this was brought to RfD; the page move linked in the nomination has been closed as not moved, so any argument about mirroring changes proposed there is moot. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Three-dimensional Euclidean space → Three-dimensional space  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Please discuss at Talk:Euclidean_space#Requested_move_11_March_2023. fgnievinski (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do not understand why you have nominated this redirect for discussion — even if the term Euclidean space tends to refer to the three-dimensional case, that does not warrant doing anything to this redirect because the latter article is about a construct in arbitrary dimensions, while the current target is closest to the name of the redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the discussion indicated above, I had proposed Euclidean space to be renamed as Euclidean n-space. Then Three-dimensional space would be renamed over the Three-dimensional Euclidean space redirect. fgnievinski (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @Fgnievinski: you created this redirect yourself a week back and nominated it here a day later. There have been no other editors to the redirect. Why list it at RfD? Are you looking for validation that the redirect creation was justified? Jay 💬 06:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  There was some ambiguity as to whether Three-dimensional Euclidean space should be covered in Euclidean space or in Three-dimensional space. fgnievinski (talk) 03:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio ^giuliano 10:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Geometric space → Geometry  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Please discuss at Talk:Geometric_space#Splitting_from_Euclidean_n-space. fgnievinski (talk) 03:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep We do not need to do anything to this redirect. If the article is split, the page can simply be overwritten with the split content without any loss of attribution. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep per LaundryPizza03. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• @Fgnievinski: What is to be discussed? Is the present topic sufficiently notable to deserve its own article? That is a discussion for AfD, not RfD. Jay 💬 05:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).