The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

IslaamMaged126[edit]

FINAL (0/2/0); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 17:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IslaamMaged126 (talk · contribs) - Altough it is just over a month since my last RFA debate,I have now figured out more and have a bit more expirience. I've decided to try again. Even if I don't succeed, I'm pretty happy to try again. IslaamMaged126 (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
I intend to try my best in cleaning up wikiedia,aiding users in need of help, tagging unneeded pages for deletion,and catching vandals and block them when necessary.Even if you do not belive me, I have more expirence than before.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
It's hard to say,but my best contributions are : Uploading files, cleaning up wikipedia, and catching vandals, along with blocking them when necessary.Also,according to my edit review,I have edited a lot on wikipedia related pages (AFD debates,etc.)
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Although I have not been in an edit conflict, I think the way I will deal with it is calmly tell the user what I think about what he/she's doing,then explain what I am trying to do.

General comments[edit]

RfAs for this user:

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/IslaamMaged126 before commenting.

Discussion[edit]

Support[edit]
Oppose[edit]
  1. Oppose and move for speedy close, user lacks most necessary qualifications for a sysop and has failed two previous RfAs in the past four weeks. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 17:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - May mean well, but with virtually no experience, not using edit summaries, and not getting the RFA template right, i think this user should try again at a later time. Snow close. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 17:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral[edit]
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category