The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

The Mad Bomber[edit]

Final(0/10/0) Ended 11:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Removed, closed as an invalid nomination. Essjay (Talk) 11:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Mad Bomber (talk · contribs) – I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia in my spare time.

You can see a list of articles I have contributed on my userpage.

--The Mad Bomber (talk) 07:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I The Mad Bomber accept this nomination under my own free will.
--The Mad Bomber (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Strong Support --Qu4rk 07:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support, even if he was blocked a month ago, he still can become a better user. -- Go Yanks! 08:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an IP impersonating.Blnguyen | rant-line 08:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
205.188.116.66 (talk · contribs) impersonating User:Can't sleep, Yankees will beat Red Sox who has been blocked for his username. --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 08:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The block is being disputed -- Go Yanks! 08:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that can't be proven that it is you, and if so, blocked users aren'ta llowed to participate.Blnguyen | rant-line 08:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vote struck again. Whether it's you or not, you're voting anonymously and anons can't vote. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 08:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
  1. Strong Oppose The candidate was blocked for making racist personal attacks [1].Has 18 Wikipedia-space edits. --Srikeit (Talk | Email) 07:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Nigger please?
    --The Mad Bomber (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Strong Oppose recommend withdrawal -- Samir धर्म 07:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Trolling on your own RfA is additional bad form -- Samir धर्म 07:51, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sadly oppose, per above. Will (message me!) 07:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    What the hell?!!?! I thought you was ma homie?!?! Damn dawg, what's the matter with you?
    --The Mad Bomber (talk) 07:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose Lets make a record: Time from self-nom RfA to banning. --mboverload@ 08:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    29 minutes from signing this RfA until getting blocked. DarthVader 08:15, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong oppose making racist remarks on the users own Rfa.--Andeh 08:04, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose per above. It is unfortunate that my 2500th edit is an oppose vote, but there is no doubt that the behaviour here shows that you are no where near ready to become an admin. Please try changing your attitude if you wish to become an admin in the future. DarthVader 08:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Strong oppose Editor blocked for personal attacks less than a month ago, see their talk page at the time. I don't understand the point of this edit either. Racist remarks on one's own RfA. I also strongly suggest you withdraw. Kevin_b_er 08:08, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    User was blocked... No point in all of this. Grandmasterka 08:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Is it ok for me to block or a denial of process?Blnguyen | rant-line 08:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Completely appropriate - Glen 08:36, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No brainer oppose, block and name ban. Tyrenius 08:56, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oppose Sarah Ewart (Talk) 09:57, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong Oppose, per above. Totally unsuitable. RandyWang (raves/rants) 11:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
Comments
  1. I have blocked this user for you know what....If it is not permissible to do this during his RfA, then pleas unblock him.Blnguyen | rant-line 08:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Seeing as how the candidate has been blocked, I suggest a bureaucrat remove this nomination. Is that possible? --Merovingian (T, C, @) 08:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I want to help delete unencyclopedic and autobiographical articles.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Not really, I try to put the same effort into all of my contributions.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: There are some political articles I disagree with, but I just don't edit those because I know I don't have a neutral point of view on them.
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category