If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/G.-M. Cupertino))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


 Clerk note: I don't know to which extent the case is related to the RfAr, but it might be better to request it on the case itself if they are tied. -- lucasbfr ho ho ho 16:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was opened as an RfAr case today, but it would be a conflict of interest for me to request it through them as I'm an arbitration clerk, so I'm trying to maintain transparency. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 17:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed, also Gonçalo-Manuel (talk · contribs) and SavetheArchduke (talk · contribs). I've blocked both accounts as sockpuppets (they were used disruptively a few weeks ago; see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/SavetheArchduke) and extended G.-M. Cupertino's block for block evasion under Gonçalo-Manuel. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.