If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Robotam))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Robotam[edit]

Robotam (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
MrDarcy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Came around september 6. his second edit was sept 12th, his third was on the 13th it basically seems as if his whole existance was to sign this RFC. I believe him to be a sockpuppet (refer to contribs).

Robotam has made it a pesonal mission to destroy pages created by ninjanubian as can be documented by his actions at Talk:Sigma Pi Phi and Talk:Alpha Kappa Nu.
He opens up dispute pages for the sake of wasting everyone time.
He is also reverting pages twice in the past 90 minutes [1] [2]
See here for 3RR. [3]

Ongoing revert war on multiple topics and boards as well as filing for RFC's and AFD's

[4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Bearly541 the co author has also been problematic in that he has posted things such as Ninja Nubian [10], reverted edits on kappa alpha psi [11], over here [12] and here [13] both on september 11th, over here as well [14] on the alpha phi alpha article twice on september 11th [15] as can be seen here [16] and here [17] as well as here on another day [18].

Mykungfu 22:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: These accounts were found to be unrelated at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ccson below. You need to pursue some other form of Dispute resolution. Thatcher131 23:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Please don't ask again. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.