If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shakim67))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

IntheGhetto06[edit]

User appears to be another abusive sockpuppet of a user blocked for personal attacks, using multiple sockpuppets, etc., and seems to be continuing the abuse. See for example [1]. Yamla 18:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Added checkip. User has so far created three sockpuppets that we have caught so if this user is once again using abusive sockpuppets, it would be nice to place a block on the IP address as well. --Yamla 20:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Additionally, please note within minutes of answering a Helpme for the the IP here, where I warned the IP of my suspicions of block evasion, User:IntheGhetto06 account was created. The second thing the user did after putting in a help me for the autoblock was to request unblock, giving the same IP as the user I had just warned. Here the user admits to that being his IP, but now claims that he shares it with his friend whose little brother had maybe done something, but left for six months. Additionally, the user made a personal attack against User:JD UK regarding sexual preference, the exact same attack made by the blocked users. The user has also copy-and-pasted his userpage from the pages of the blocked accounts. Teke 02:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a nice diff [2]. I think we can trust her. Ryūlóng 02:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here's another [3]. Teke 07:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following are other accounts that have been proven to be related to this user

Also note that the IP address left this message in my archives, more than likely due to the Wiki-essay I am working on, which means someone has gone through my contributions. Ryūlóng 21:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I'm a bit confused. Who do you think is the main account/alleged puppetmaster? Thatcher131 (talk) 05:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed I've noticed that the other confirmed sockpuppets are only blocked for a month, which seems odd to me. I'm reblocking them all indefinitely and treating Shakim67 as the main account. Mackensen (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shakim67))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Shakim67[edit]

All of these users had shown up in the past few days and all have nearly the same writing styles and ages, focuses on edit counting (and wishes to become admins based off of their edit counts), and all treat Wikipedia like MySpace. Specifically this message placed by Can't Nobody Step To Me (formerly shinemygrillz) on Cute 1 4 u's userpage which showed at least some block evasion/sockpuppetry. While I doubt that the sockpuppeteer would be posting messages on his own puppets pages, there's still some suspicion about the identities of these users (several claim to be related to each other, although they may just be using AAVE calling each other brother and sister). Ryūlóng 01:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Can't Nobody Step To Me blocked for a week, Chrisbrownwifey06 for a month, Also, here are some interesting diffs[4][5]. Voice-of-All 22:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed except for Cute 1 4 u (talk · contribs), which is Red X Unrelated. Kelly Martin (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More