|
WP:RFC/U is an informal non-binding process enabling users to discuss problems with specific editors who may have violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines. This venue lists all open/active RfC/Us. |
| Are you in the right place? Click in the corresponding box if you want to see: | |||||||
| Guidance on creating or certifying RfC/Us |
Draft RfC/Us |
Participating in RfC/Us |
Requests for assistance with RfC/Us |
Archived RfC/Us | |||
How to proceed[edit]
- Thinking about creating or certifying an RfC/U? See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance first.
- Thinking about generally participating in an RfC/U? Or responding to an RfC/U where you are the subject? See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Guidance2.
Instructions for this page[edit]
All participants in a user conduct RfC are expected to comply with the rules and guidelines, stated here, and below.
- Once an RfC is created, it should be listed in the "Candidates pages" section, until the minimum requirements (listed below) have been met.
- Once the requirements are met, the RfC should be moved from the "Candidate pages" section to the "Approved pages" section.
- If the minimum requirements are not met, see closing and archiving (listed further below) if the minimum requirements are not met.
Minimum requirements
Before requesting community comment, at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem. Any RfC not accompanied by evidence showing that two users tried and failed to resolve the same dispute will be deleted after 48 hours as "uncertified". The evidence, preferably in the form of diffs, should not simply show the dispute itself, but should show attempts to find a resolution or compromise. The users certifying the dispute must be the same users who were involved in the attempt to resolve it.
Closing and archiving
RfCs which do not meet the minimum requirements should be marked for speedy deletion with the ((db-maintenance)) tag after 48 hours. Such RfCs should be delisted from the "Candidate pages" section as they are considered "uncertified".
Certified disputes may be removed from this page and archived under any of the following circumstances:
- If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
- The parties to the dispute agree (motions to close should be posted on the talk page).
- The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.
Remove the link from the list here and add it to the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive. If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.
((subst:ConductResult|outcome of RfC)) may be used for the closing of the RfC.
General user conduct[edit]
RfCs about user conduct should be listed in this section unless the complaint is specifically about the use of admin privileges (see section below) or the choice of username (see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names).
List the dispute as follows:
- Example user
- {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~ (note: that is five tildes, not four, RfCs are signed with the date only, not your username)
Candidate pages (users)
Approved pages (users)
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
Use of administrator privileges[edit]
This section is only for RfCs specifically related to the use of sysop rights by Wikipedia:Administrators. This includes the actions of protecting or unprotecting pages, deleting or undeleting pages, blocking or unblocking users, and enforcing Arbitration Committee decisions. If the dispute is over an admin's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above.
List an admin dispute as follows:
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example admin
- Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~
Candidate pages (admins)
Approved pages (admins)
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.
Use of bot privileges[edit]
This section is only for discussions specifically related to the operation of a bot. This includes the actions of unauthorized bots, bots without flags, and inter-wiki bots. It does not include the use of scripts or semi-automated tools on a user's account. If the dispute is over a bot owner's actions as an editor, it should be listed under the General user conduct section above.
List the dispute as follows:
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example bot
- Allegations: {one or two short sentences giving the dry facts} ~~~~~
Candidate pages (bots)
Approved pages (bots)
These RfCs have met the two-person threshold. List newer entries on top.