This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• Oren Laurent · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

AFD !votes supported recreation for purpose of redirect, to Banc De Binary, which survived 3 deletion attempts and is now calm. Whole history should be restored, and whole talk history should be restored for merge to subject talk archives. -Okteriel (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oren Laurent, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Since this was done via AfD, I'd recommend talking to User:DGG about this or to any of the admins that previously deleted the page. This page is really only for the non-controversial deletions and given that the page is associated with a fairly notorious sockmaster, it's best to follow the rules pretty strictly for this just so everything's on the up and up. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
• Don't take this the wrong way, but because of the page's association with User:Morning277 I would highly recommend that you ask a more experienced editor to request the page's restoration in any context. You're a very, very new user and Morning277 is known for creating many, many, MANY socks so I'll be honest: people will automatically be suspect of a new editor who has made a lot of new edits about a page associated with that sockmaster. It would be better if you could get a more experienced editor and one that is not associated with the company itself, to be the main person to ask for article re-creation. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. I did disclose on my talk and article talk that the subject had replied to my email questions after I had developed an interest in editing it, so I don't want to run afoul. It seems like if it weren't for the controversy it would be a redirect with a full history, and I wanted to see what the history was, so I guess I can try the admins or DRV after I reread everything. Okteriel (talk) 06:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• That's the best way to go about it because like I said, Morning277/MooshiePorkFace is a pretty sensitive subject here and anything associated with them has to be dealt with very specifically and delicately to avoid future complications. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• The Daniell Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Royal Daniell Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The articles stated above are being deleted without proper explanation by TheLongTone (talk · contribs). They have been proven to have relevant information and corresponding sources, so the deletions are unjustified. I suspect his or her actions are a result of a bias to my newly created account rather then the accuracy of my information. I would appreciate your consideration to these articles. Thank you and much appreciated. Caoon (talk) 23:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

• Comment: I think that part of the issue was that the articles were so short and that you didn't actually link to a source where we could verify it ourselves. You list books, but not page numbers or the other stuff. I might userfy this for you, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Hmm... I tried pulling up one of the books you listed, "Philanthropical Contributions of the Daniell Empire", but I can't actually find a book by that name. To be honest, that kind of makes it a little suspicious since we do need to be able to verify the sources. Listing sources is a good step, but we do need to be able to verify that they exist and that they're about the subject at hand. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
• I also can't find any mention of the Daniell family in the Kevin Phillips book either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:43, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done I'm not going to restore this, as I can't verify that any of the information. Not only does the Phillips book not mention Daniell from what I can see, but I can find no actual record of the other two books. That looks more than a little suspicious and I'd need to see more proof of the family's existence before I restore anything. We need to be able to verify the information to ensure that it's not a hoax or that the family is non-notable. Just saying that books exist on the subject isn't enough- we have to verify that the books exist and that they're about the family in question. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:48, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

See the previous ANI thread: [1] No verifiable evidence for the existence of this supposedly 'influential' family has been provided - it is clearly a hoax. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Incidentally, I just deleted one of them and salted both. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 07:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Hmm... I've opened up an SPI here to see if the newer user is a sock of the others, although it looks fairly clear. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

• Definite d · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Def91 (talk) 00:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm just tryna make a page for myself! I am a rapper! I just would like to make a page for myself about who I am and my music career! Please don't delete this page I beg you!

 Not done Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. Try Facebook or Myspace. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Crossfire Wrestling · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The Crossfire Wrestling page should not be deleted because it's an actual wrestling promotion based in St. Catharines, Ontario. even check there website @ www.crossfirewrestling.com for information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrestlingman1234 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossfire Wrestling, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tone (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Evan Becker · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 65.30.151.47, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.30.151.47 (talk) 01:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Check out WP:Notability: you need references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Mike Massy · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

will review content and revert the comments to make it verifiable -Celinehitti (talk) 06:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done. This page is a copyright violation from http://www.bdroom.org/underground-music/MusicAristsArchive/Disk-Of-AristsArchive/maykmasymikemassy. Wikipedia cannot hold copyright material, even temporarily. You need to write in your own words - please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste. Even if the copyright situation were resolved, this would not be suitable: Wikipedia is not a place to post copies of peoples' own promotional material - see User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard. JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Oru Muthassi Katha · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Adequate references added at the page and please do not delete the page -Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

This page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. You may remove the Proposed Deletion template, though the article may then be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion. See WP:Notability (films) for Wikipedia's notability standard for film articles. JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Brendan Perlini · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Michael Dal Colle · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 13:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Buddypress · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -1.187.203.101 (talk) 06:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. Malformed request. No article called "Buddypress", or any similar title I searched for, has ever existed on Wikipedia, either in main space or AFC space or Draft space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

(edit conflict)  Done - it was BuddyPress. I have removed a POINTy and incorrectly placed PROD template, but the article could do with better references to show notability. The first of the two refs is a deadlink, and searching for "BuddyPress" on the site referred to produces no result. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Huh. I wonder how I missed seeing that in the list of deleted articles. Maybe the search is case sensitive? Anyway, thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gil Blank · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Eyaleck, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eyaleck (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Gil Blank who is the main actor in the Israeli Blockbuster Hunting Elephants has been traveling in Asia these days promoting the film in several local film festivals. His details will most probably be searched in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyaleck (talk • contribs) 19:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Billpay_GmbH · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 92.230.132.118, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.230.132.118 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done The entire article had issues with tone, as it came across as fairly promotional overall. I really think that it would be better if you re-wrote it completely from scratch. Other editors that declined it have commented upon its promotional nature and I think that at this stage it would be more beneficial if you just re-wrote it as opposed to trying to prune the promotional content out, as you'd end up having to re-write the article anyway when it came down to it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hogreeve · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Humanracing, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Humanracing (talk) 01:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done This already appears to exist at Hog reeve, but your copy is longer than the one in the mainspace and has more sourcing, so I'm restoring it and putting it in your userspace at User:Humanracing/Hogreeve. I figure that you can polish this up some and then just cut/paste your version in the mainspace's entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Jonathan Power · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Last Sunday I wrote here about being deleted 10 days ago. I have had no reply.

I do protest my deletion- I was told that 3 references didn't stand up. But they do and I want to discuss what happened.

jonathan power — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.129.20 (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Power, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/illume OS · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Csiew88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. clarence.siew (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• User:Hbougatfa/James Moran (ambassador) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 158.169.40.7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 158.169.40.7 (talk) 08:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done I'm declining this for two reasons. The first is that the article is only one sentence long and there's really nothing to restore. The second is that you asked for this to be restored previously and made no edits on it, which disinclines me to restore it a second time, as it was restored and then ignored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• James Moran (ambassador) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It is the page of the European Union ambassador and we need to get it back to but some updates -158.169.40.7 (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. That's just a redirect to a page that has been deleted, and that page had no content. Start over at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, because you seem to have a conflict of interest about the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Melt (iPhone App) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Didn't edit for 6 months so it was deleted, but now want to update it and re-submit. -Themeek100 (talk) 22:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Infofree.com · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please restore this page, it was deleted as it was a website but it is a business. I will improve it such that I hope this will not happen again. -Busybeeohbee (talk) 03:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Y (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• I also noted that the tone was fairly casual in tone and came across as a little promotional. It would need a fairly complete re-write to make it more neutral and encyclopedic. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Denis Couprie · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Vrowse, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vrowse (talk) 02:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Seth Yudof · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article was deleted by user "FreeRangeFrog" as they considered the article to be advertisement rather than strictly unbiased biographical work. Rather than a complete deletion, I would like to be able to correct any potential advertisement-considered text and better cite /attribute biographical information for this article. -Jojohot1 (talk) 16:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• I looked at the article and I can see where User:FreeRangeFrog deleted it. To get the article to meet our guidelines for sourcing and neutrality, it'd require a complete re-write. Even then, I can't really see where he's been the focus of enough coverage in independent and reliable sources to pass notability guidelines. I see where he exists and performs, but not where he's received the coverage necessary to pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Even if it was restored, I doubt he'd pass the inevitable WP:AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Also see User_talk:FreeRangeFrog#Deletion_of_.22Seth_Yudof.22_page. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bethany Barton · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Redheadednowhere, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Redheadednowhere (talk) 05:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tony Smith (Private Investigator)) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 213.123.218.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 213.123.218.249 (talk) 08:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done I debated over this one, but the tone of the article is so casual that it comes across as promotional. It also reads like it was directly lifted from a press release or personal website, so I can't quite get over the feeling that this is WP:COPYVIO from somewhere. There is an assertion of notability so I'm not against the idea of you creating a new AfC from scratch, but this would require a complete re-write in order to meet our NPOV guidelines. On a side note, you will also need to have more sourcing to assert notability since the links aren't actually about Smith. He's mentioned in passing and isn't the focus of the articles, which is what we'd need to show notability. They show that he exists, but existing is not notability (WP:ITEXISTS). While I was looking for the potential copyvio I didn't really see a lot of stuff that was non-primary and in-depth, so it will take a lot of digging. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Draft:International Youth Society of Eco-Friendly and Renewable Technology (IYSERT) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted as a copyright violation; I am processing a ticket sent to the Volunteer Response Team (ticket:2014061110004858) stating that the page is is based upon is compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. -Microchip08 (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

What about the tone of the page? It still won't be undeleted if it violates WP:Spam or WP:NPOV, Microchip. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. I have left a couple of comments on the ticket. Even if advertising copy is licensed for use on Wikipedia, Wikipedia has no obligation to accept it for publication. The author should start over from scratch. There is zero benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring promotional content like this. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Enterprise Architect (software) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This was a long standing article with a long history of contributions from numerous authors.

It included numerous references from/to other articles.

It was stated on the deletion page to be listed on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Software It was not present.

The article was receiving well over 1000 views per month. It was referenced by numerous other pages including a number of key comparison articles e.g. the Database modeling comparison chart.

Pleae restore this article. -Leggattst (talk) 05:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Architect (software), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tom Morris (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

This AFD is crazy, as this is a notable piece of software. I suppose DRV will have to have a shot. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

The likely outcome of the DRV would be to re-list it at AFD for further debate. It's worth a shot. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Aporagender · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This gender is a significant gender identity and important to those who identify with it. -Francesvhale (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, especially if it's something you made up on your own blog. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Trivia Tower · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 86.144.13.242, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.144.13.242 (talk) 19:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I will add some more information to the article, and try again to get it published

I haven't worked on my article due to the birth of my 2nd child. I now have more time as he is nearing 1 years old, and so wish to continue editing the article. I will add some more references. Thanks

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sigma Upsilon Zeta · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rlanter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rlanter (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry Kelly (Handgun Hunter) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 4.59.58.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 4.59.58.133 (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

I will add that the article will never be accepted for submission until you clean up the citations. See WP:CITE for guidance. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Child and Youth Worker's Ring · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sarniacentre4arts (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the panda ₯’ 23:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Template:LegendRJL · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
• Module:LegendRJL · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The outcome of this template's TfD was to subst and delete. However, it was not subst'd correctly, which broke all uses of it. Please temporarily undelete them so I can undo the improper subst's and re-subst it properly, and then I will request their re-deletion. -Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please clarify. I'm not sure exactly what you want to do here. Is there something you need to change in those two files before re-deleting them? Or copy some content to a new template? Would it suffice if I pasted the template source on your talk page, or emailed it to you? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

@Amatulic: I need them undeleted in place, otherwise they won't easily subst right. I'm going to make a change to them and re-subst them everywhere they were substed incorrectly. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

OK Done. Jackmcbarn, please let me know when you're ready for them to be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

@Amatulic: Thanks, they're ready for re-deletion now. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Re-deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reginald Kevin Gee (Reg K Gee) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, VictorEdgar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VictorEdgar (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done The article had a slight promotional tone to it that made it read like it was something written for the artist's own personal website. It wasn't so bad that I'd completely deny it on that basis, but it was bad enough that it would have to have had some serious editing for tone. What is mostly keeping me from restoring it is that the article appears to be copyvio from this link. Please understand that we cannot accept copyright violations and even if the artist gives it up as fair use, you would still have to re-write a lot of it to make it less promotional and casual, and more neutral and encyclopedic. It's close, but it is still written in a manner that would give a lot of editors pause. I would highly recommend re-writing it in your own words, as even if the artist gives it up as fair use, you will always, always have people tagging it as copyvio. It really will not be worth the constant hassle the article would get if it was ever accepted into the mainspace. Of the articles that do keep copyvio in the article, almost all of them will get re-written at some point in time and even then there is always the negative associations that copyvio brings to an article (advertisement, paid editing, self-promotion, etc). It's just better to do it now and not have associations with copyvio and promotions, as it's really not worth the hassle. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• User:Random519/Samir Is The Best 2011 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I wish to have this undeleted because it was accidentally deleted by a friend and then click the "Save page" button below -75.159.57.247 (talk) 04:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done It actually wasn't deleted, but blanked. HOWEVER the content on the page was pretty much the epitome of what Wikipedia is WP:NOT supposed to be used for. We're WP:NOTAWEBHOST for jokes between a group of friends, regardless of where it is posted. I'm sorry if that comes across as harsh because it's not meant to be, but that's really not an appropriate use of the userspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• ORX · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted as "not sufficient reliable coverage was found" by the deleter. I disagree as there are quite a few reliable sources covering it, including sourceforge.net, bitbucket.org, indiegametools.com, mobilegameengines.com, gamedevelopment.tutsplus.com and its homesite at orx-project.org/about -Dotorx (talk) 04:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've notified User:Odie5533 of the contested deletion as well. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Sky Televentures · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this is not for advertise,this for information purpose Please restore the page as I intend to work on it -Honkerlust (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. The entire thing was an advertisement, with meaningless superlatives such as "state of the art" and use of the pronoun "we". There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring such stuff. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You can try using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit articles on subjects with which you are associated. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Amulya Infotech India Pvt. Ltd. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page isn't created for any promotion or marketing activities. Kindly if you restore the page, we will re-work on it if anything violates the content guidelines 122.183.241.126 (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. We cannot restore content that was copied from another source. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Adil Khan Adii goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This pages is about my self so please don't delete this page! -Adil Khan 5216 (talk) 18:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

 Not done Wikipedia is not the place to advertise yourself, try Facebook or a blog. In any case, you've been blocked for a month for disruptive editing and promotion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Smith · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Russellcrank, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Russellcrank (talk) 08:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Light Beacon · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Joeleckert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please undelete this page, I plan on future ediots before resubmission and would liek to at least copy the code to have it so I don't have to write it all from scratch again. Joeleckert (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Labour Dynamix · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Need more time to edit the article. Was not aware that it would lapse "Save page" button below -Jonkmanskas (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done I almost didn't restore this because it's written in inappropriate prose (almost reads like an advertisement) and there is no clear assertion of notability. But maybe it just needs a chance. If you fail to edit it for six months, it will be deleted again, and we will not restore it a second time. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coherer (musician) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Thespirit3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thespirit3 (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EFA Diamonds Inc. · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Annidani84, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Annidani84 (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Comment: I'd largely prefer that you make a new version, as the old version was slightly promotional in how it was written. I'm not against the idea of you working on another version, but this would probably need a lot of work to make it more fit our WP:NPOV standards as it was previously written. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dominion City · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Emekks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Emekks (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done The article read like a promotional page and the entire thing would have to be re-written from scratch. It also seems to be copyvio from this page and likely is from others. Please understand that we cannot accept copyright violations and that even if the text was given up as fair use, it would still require a fundamental re-write to remove the promotional prose. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al Washam · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 169.130.15.45, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.130.15.45 (talk) 03:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done The article is very, very short, as it is only two sentences long. It also uses peacock/promotional terms to describe Al Washam, so removing them would end up removing the sentences as a whole. It'd be better to just re-write the AfC submission from scratch, although you do need to ensure that he passes WP:ATHLETE. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anoop Sankar · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Priyaradhakrishnan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Priyaradhakrishnan (talk) 05:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lan-Kyoung Hong · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 167.206.228.69, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 167.206.228.69 (talk) 13:06, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. It was just one sentence. Start over, without referring to her as "the super wife of..." ~Amatulić (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Deulahland · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kajikho, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. kho 14:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Gladson Samuel ES · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this article is about a local website owner and this article is for the motivation of young people around that locality(nagercoil,tamil nadu,india so please appreciate this try and this will help user like me to bring out ,local talents to the people of nagercoil and other parts of tamil nadu ,thank you -samuels.gladson (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment: But that's not the purpose of Wikipedia - and with every time you click "save" you re-agree to the purpose of Wikipedia the panda ɛˢˡ” 15:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

   Comment Article had been deleted mutliple times at Gladson Samuel ES as well as at Gladson Samuel · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions], each time for failing to assert notability (CSD A7). —C.Fred (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done, for reasons already given in abundant detail on Gladson.samuel's talk page. Both articles are now protected from recreation, since he doesn't seem to be getting the message that he cannot have an article about himself. Please use Facebook for your self-promotion purposes. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Adrien Beard · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

A three-time Emmy Award winner is notable -Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 19:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done. I've placed a deletion tag on it, with a reset time period. Articles about living people require sourcing in order for editors to be able to verify information, so as soon as material on the page is sufficiently sourced, you can ask someone to remove the tag or remove it yourself. Protonk (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 370 (Franklin County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 2209 (St. Johns County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 502 (Brevard County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 419 (Osceola County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 505 (Indian River County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Broadway (Tampa) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 512 (Indian River County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 17:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• County Road 210 (St. Johns County, Florida) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

history undeletion under redirect -NE2 18:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done Protonk (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Sky Televenture · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

yesterday I got error it's advertise,now page deleted due to "how or why the subject is important or significant" what is that ? you are asking how or why the subject is important or significant? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikona_Digital_Networks like this page Sky Televenture page is also important or significant -Honkerlust (talk) 18:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The existence of other articles cannot be used to justify your own article. Also, the other speedy is a G11, which likewise will not get undeleted here. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Not done. See your request above for the nearly identical article (#Sky Televentures). You clearly have a conflict of interest. So go and read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit your article, instead of trying to publish it in main article space. Also read WP:Golden rule; if your article can't comply with those basic requirements, then it will not be accepted. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adolph Kuhn · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Devinne, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Devinne (talk) 23:25, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Siri Parakum · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 112.134.47.35, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 112.134.47.35 (talk) 05:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• I didn't have time to review the artcle in full but i will now and then click the "Save page" button below -112.134.47.35 (talk) 05:40, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Sherren mozafari · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

because sherren mozafari is a professional young gymnast and she definitely deserves a wiki page . -Neginnicole (talk) 10:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. the panda ₯’ 10:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lauren Scott · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, LaurenAlexS, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LaurenAlexS (talk) 05:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Although concerned about a) WP:COI, b) WP:PROMO, c) a failure to meet WP:POLITICIAN and other notability standards, Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the panda ₯’ 11:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Jhalli anjali · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Editindiaedit (talk) 06:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done The article a) fails notability (it is a new show after all, and its existence is not enough to be notable), b) it's written in a promotional manner - in fact, it reads like an advert, and c) the sources being used are unacceptable, including Facebook the panda ₯’ 11:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

• Vatsal shah · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vatsalshah1 (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

 Not done The article is not eligible for undeletion, and Wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself. Try Facebook or a blog. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)