90.200.85.232

90.200.85.232 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
11 October 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Revolving IP user who currently has at least 3 other ip addresses blocked for sockpuppetry, edit warring, disruptive editing against MOS, etc.

The currently active IP: Special:Contributions/90.199.99.186 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tai_Chi_Master_%281993_film%29&diff=454917160&oldid=453978338

Already blocked IPs: Special:Contributions/90.200.85.129 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tai_Chi_Master_%281993_film%29&diff=prev&oldid=442892534

Special:Contributions/90.199.99.239 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tai_Chi_Master_%281993_film%29&diff=prev&oldid=453727529

Special:Contributions/90.200.85.232 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tai_Chi_Master_%281993_film%29&diff=prev&oldid=428251653 Millahnna (talk) 11:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

There's not much for SPI to do here. The two IPs appear to locate to the same area. If there is a persistent problem, WP:RFPP may be the better venue. TNXMan 13:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ongoing persistent problem that plagues a ton of articles. The IP crops up every few weeks and begins anew and has been driving the film project crazy for at least a year that I know of. SO I should be requesting protection for all of those pages? Seriously? Thanks I guess. Millahnna (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


These IPs were linked in the previous sock case due to the same disruptive editing patterns (overlinking, changing genres/countries of origin, adding unsourced info/changing editing tags without good reason) on the same types of articles i.e. martial arts films. The reported IP received a six month block while the current one was only blocked for a month, and now that has expired he has seemingly picked up where he left off. Apart from the disruptive editing he is clearly guilty of block evasion now too. Betty Logan (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 December 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Yet another sock. I would recommend an extension of the range block, which Rodhullandemu did last year. See the thread here (with 28 IPs caught by me previously as well) and here. 90.199.99.0/24, 90.200.85.0/24 and 90.201.141.0/24 is the relevant ranges. Nymf hideliho! 09:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

07 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


History in article matches history of previous edits. Just editing various action film articles and wrestlers with uncited and bogus information. Doesn't respond to talk page warnings. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 August 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Disruptive activity on film articles with a focus on the martial arts genre. 90.199.99.147 is already blocked, but here is the intersect between the two recent IPs: [1]. Intersect between the master account and 90.200.85.84: [2]. Betty Logan (talk) 21:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Blocked 2 weeks. Elockid (Talk) 00:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


24 August 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Same articles, same disruptive edits, and is currently evading two blocks: Special:Contributions/90.199.99.147 and Special:Contributions/90.200.85.84. Intersects for 90.200.85.232, 90.199.99.147 and 90.200.85.84. Betty Logan (talk) 14:45, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

28 August 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Editor avoiding a range block on 90.200.85.0/24 and an IP block on Special:Contributions/90.199.99.147. Intersects for 90.200.85.232, 90.200.85.84, 90.200.85.223, and 90.199.99.147. Betty Logan (talk) 15:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note 90.199.99.0/24 rangeblocked two weeks. We could probably due longer since they appear to be the only one on there. Elockid (Talk) 16:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


14 October 2013
Suspected sockpuppets


As per information passed on to me on my talk page [3], a list of suspected IPs of that vandal here [4] and on the IPs contribs here [5] KiraChinmoku 08:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

20 September 2014
Suspected sockpuppets

User is the martial arts vandal. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments