Architect 134

Architect 134 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134/Archive.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.

30 June 2024

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Sleeper account, gamed AC, straight to A134 'topics'. The userbox is used by a bunch of previous A134 accounts. CU for any more. Pahunkat (talk) 03:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

02 July 2024

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

After seeing User:Zzuuzz's block on User:Mitrex05 mentioning 'LTA/A134' in the block reason, it reminded me strongly of what happened over at User:Obsidian Soul recently, where a new account 'User:Murmayo' gamed autoconfirmed (by placing McDonald's "Filet-o-fish" templates on their user page and user talk page (see diff 1 and diff 2, compare it to diff 3 and diff 4)), to add some inflammatory "retired" notice on User:Obsidian Soul's user page (diff, compare it to this diff). Both of these accounts were created in late 2021 too. — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:29, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories